https://www.(Webm, use an alternative platform, or use https://instances.invidio.us/)(Please use archive.today)/watch?v=4fVQwzv5Qfc

The Digital Reichstag is burning. The war begins in earnest now.

>>6741 Jesus Christ they wasted no time seizing on this shit. Wonder how far this shit will go? I'm half expecting all other industries to follow their lead and crack down on everything while they have the excuse.

>>6755 All the way to the shooting war. https://archive.vn/tw9u8

>>6741 The good thing to come out of this, is that the kikes have fully dropped the illusion. There's no fucking around now. Be smart, and stay safe. Don't let the kikes win, and don't let the niggerpills get to you.

why dont they just move to another platform for fucks sake?

>>6772 Because of the silicon racket and (((credit companies))) marginalizing and murdering competitors, respectively.

>>6776 >Trump locked out of Twitch So he can't stream Fortnite either?

They even got Ben Garrison.

>>6741 If you don't kill your enemies, they win.

reading and shitposting on twitter makes my brain hurt. Fucking leftist are pulling out because of this statement. These people think ACLU is defending Trump? Fucking retards with no reading comprehension.

>>6824 Just in - true dough

>>6741 >Literally growing alt tech overnight >conservatives slowly realized Russia, south east Asia and Brazil has more freedom than Americans (((American tech))) has now and always been the economy

>>6839 >economy It was suppose to say the enemy

Trump’s Twitter ban is a step toward ending the hijacking of the First Amendment Liberalism can’t exist without censorship https://archive.fo/QveCV

>>6776 At this rate no gamer will use twitch

>>6841 You have it backwards. You are the one fighting for liberty. You are the one fighting for liberalism. The ones arguing for censorship are inherently against liberalism.

>>6831 Well oy vey, we can't have anyone doubting an election that's still contested in multiple states, oy gevalt! >>6843 I think twitch basically bans anyone who isn't openly gay. But yeah, I don't know who the fuck would use it. Their platform sucked so badly they had to expand to non-gaming content precisely because everyone who is an actual gamer hates their fucking gay rules.

>‘I Can’t Go Home Tonight’: Parler CEO John Matze Says He’s Getting Death Threats >“It is disgusting. People threatening my life. I can’t go home tonight. So this is really a lot, you know. This is not just, you know, our civil liberties. They can shut down a … half a billion dollar company … overnight.” >“So we’re going to do it. We’re going to be back online one day. And hopefully soon, as soon as possible. But this is a real challenge. We have to build our own infrastructure — our own everything in order to do it.” https://archive.is/jebMR >Parler CEO blasts AOC, elected officials who called to ban his app >Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., recently urged Apple and Google to take action against Parler, in a tweet the leader of the so-called "Squad" of progressives sent to her 11.4 million followers. Ocasio-Cortez isn’t alone. Many people on the left have made similar complaints >"I think it’s sick," Matze told Fox News. "That’s not what the Constitution said. That’s not what the Constitution stands for, banning 10-plus million U.S. voters from the internet, barring people from free speech. When people do things like that, it shows that they don’t understand the meaning of the Constitution or this country and what it stands for." >"Frankly, I would call it evil, because my definition of evil is ‘forcing your will upon others,’ he said. "If you don’t like what I have to say, you can disagree with me, but you cannot take vindictive action against me without being evil." https://archive.is/s6yTf >The US and European Union have both expressed concern about Ugandan government policies in the lead-up to the vote, in which social media has been banned. The government of Uganda appears to have responded after social media giants targeted officials in the government and began removing their accounts arbitrarily. This is similar to the US where social media giants often arbitrarily remove accounts, often which they accuse of being right-wing extremists, based on unclear guidelines. For instance Twitter and social media companies coordinated to remove US President Donald Trump’s accounts after a riot at the Capitol on January 6 >Twitter claimed that “ahead of the Ugandan election, we’re hearing reports that Internet service providers are being ordered to block social media and messaging apps. We strongly condemn Internet shutdowns – they are hugely harmful, violate basic human rights and the principles of the #OpenInternet.” >However the same Twitter also said that earlier in the week: “in close coordination with our peers, we suspended a number of accounts targeting the election in Uganda. If we can attribute any of this activity to state-backed actors, we will disclose to our archive of information operations.” This means that the social media giant was removing accounts in Uganda, but then also demanding Uganda keep access to Twitter open, so that Twitter could decide what Ugandans will read in the lead-up to the election. Critics wondered if social media giants are using arbitrary internal guidelines that are not public, and how they determine who to ban. The social media giant claimed “access to information and freedom of expression, including the public conversation on Twitter, is never more important than during democratic processes, particularly elections.” However, the same social media giant restricted access to some voices https://archive.is/9PUSA

>>6942 Their getting very brave with the double think. It's not hard to see either I doubt anyone can really deny that big tech is interfering globally now (if it wasn't clear enough before). I'm hoping they'll see the consequences soon. The lack of action from anyone from the government with the banning really shows how deep the swamp is.

>>6824 There's a very good reason kike media has pushed the "if you kill your enemies you're worse than them" message for the past 60 years.

>>6944 There are valid reasons for why you don't execute all criminals, however each circumstance is different.

>>6942 Are the Ugandans banning only direct access to (((Social Media))) websites/services? If so then it's wise given the circumstances as it could teach local Negroes to use frontends like Nitter and Invidious instead of running judeascript at full blast in their browser every time.

>Trying to impeach a man a week before he leaves office. LOL. The left are seriously desperate for a win.

>>6948 considering how long federal trials last this would be a waste, I wouldn't be surprised if the trial keeps going months into Biden admiration . Politics is just circus at this point, it's all tiresome.

>Twitter's chief executive Jack Dorsey stood by the decision to ban President Donald Trump from the platform in a wide-ranging thread, but admitted that the action sets a "dangerous" precedent <"I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter, or how we got here," Dorsey wrote on Twitter Wednesday evening. He added that the decision was made "with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter." >Trump had some 80 million followers prior to his ban from Twitter and it was by far his most-used social media outlet to reach supporters. The clamp down on Trump's accounts stoked concerns about free speech and the power wielded by big tech even among Trump's critics <Dorsey reflected that ultimately he believes it was the right decision for Twitter to ban the president, saying, "Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all." <"That said, having to ban an account has real and significant ramifications," Dorsey wrote. "While there are clear and obvious exceptions, I feel a ban is a failure of ours ultimately to promote healthy conversation. And a time for us to reflect on our operations and the environment around us." <Banning an account limits public conversation and the potential for "clarification, redemption, and learning," Dorsey wrote. "And sets a precedent I feel is dangerous: the power an individual or corporation has over a part of the global public conversation," he added. >Dorsey also acknowledged that previously if users don't agree with one social media company's rules they could just go to another service provider, but that last week this "concept was challenged" as a slew of tech giants simultaneously restricted Trump's accounts. Dorsey said he doesn't think that was coordinated, but rather companies decided for themselves and were "emboldened by the actions of others." >The CEO acknowledged that the company needs to look "critically at inconsistencies of our policy and enforcement," something many social media giants have taken heat for over the past week https://archive.is/cmAs4

We all well know how terrible Twitter, Google, Furaffinity or Facebook are. I'm owning an account there, and it's been banned last year for false voting information. I'm french and stated clearly that in France we require ID to vote. Like anywhere else where you vote. (Additionally I have informed on various other boards about the incoming vote fraud. Here the services of Gendarmerie often have seized mail in ballots that have nothing official. For americans wanting to vote from foreign places.) On the case of Twitter, some accounts have been unbanned for a simple reason : Twitter collects search interests and various contact data, it's acting exactly like a honeypot. If they unban you like they did to me it's that the staff behind the database have more interest to keep certain users not banned to gather intel, and share tips to the feds. This is why you do not want to play their game. If you have been permabanned, assume you still are and give up Twitter. Or use it just to lurk. They're not gonna go after a retard who shouted "nigger" and dropped a bunch of memes, he's gonna get a new account anyways; but users with a good interaction with other profiles and clear opinions. Their goal is to catch more right wing people; their enemy, just like cops will release a drug dealer from jail just to follow him and catch the whole network. You become a snitch. Don't do that. Do not install any globohomo app like Twitter mobile, Whatsapp or Facebook messenger; these are here to fuck you in the ass with data. Data helps them anticipate everything. Data is the fuel that made these megacorporations so absurdly powerful and you don't want to help them. From now, we are all political dissidents.

>>7003 >We all well know how terrible Twitter, Google, Furaffinity or Facebook are. Well that's why you should get an Inkbunny account instead.

>>7000 Project Veritas released another twitter leak.

>>7004 Absolutely disgusting. And I say that as a furfag myself. Tor/I2P is the future, fren.

>>7330 Good luck getting anyone to use it. Clearnet's too convenient -- even anons won't bother unless forced to.