/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

CAPTCHA
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).



8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Be sure to visit /polarchive/ for file libraries and our companions at /pol/ alternative and /hispol/ Also remember the boards for The 8moe Hub, The 8moe Lounge, Animation, Board Games, Books, Degenerates, Eagles, Fitness, Food, Japan, LOL, Magic, Stonks, Technology, The Royal Palace, Those Who Consort With Beasts, Video Games, and Weapons Remember to archive all links, and videos should be attached to posts or using a front end

UK rules women are women Anonymous 04/17/2025 (Thu) 14:40:57 Id: 69f99b No. 25324
JK Rowling won
This isn't the win we think it is. The U.K. is notorious for discriminating against men, and this makes it so much easier to keep doing it
(377.96 KB 1298x1920 tap-sign.jpg)

It's haram.
>>25324 Good. always kill l-g-b-t abominations.
>>25324 I kneel too bad Islamic law was used to determine this ruling
Another fat W for gynocentrism, now men won't be able to enjoy legal equality by claiming to be women
Brits will look at black people and say, "Oi look it's an Asian, innit?"
How many ships did the UK build today?
>>25324 Only because the ruling was about actual female privileges like CEO quotas and so on, instead of just some silly games like a dart league or whatever. The moment women's special privileges are threatened, you will see them drop all the bullshit and go feral to defend them. We had plenty of articles from feminists about why women CANNOT be expected to die in wars when someone floated the idea of making military service mandatory for them, too. They'd claim some shit about how they are anti-war already anyway because it's about "their sons, brothers and fathers too!", but they never took much of an issue with the topic when it was just about throwing their male relatives into the meat grinder. They only opposed it (and quite harshly) when people pointed out that enforced equal rights for all the nice positions should come alongside enforced equal duties for the not so nice ones.
>>25724 Pretty much. Women still overwhelmingly support the troon shit because all the "battles" they are fighting against them are fake. Who cares if some troon competes in a tournament for women - yes, he'll win, but that only inconveniences one woman, and even for her it might be debatable if it was even a loss. Now she gets to whine on TV about how much she was oppressed, which will give her way more attention than a victory would have. She gets to be known as the best among the women who was victimized, whereas if she had simply won no one would have even heard about it. It's just theater to pretend they are the victims, they don't really mind it and actually prefer having it around, because it distracts from all the overwhelming special privileges society grants to them. But the second any real privileges are touched upon, like in this case (where a company tried to claim it fulfilled its women quota via troons IIRC), they will drop the shit completely. Because this one would have been an actual loss instead of just some fake whining for the sake of attention. Women protect their own interests hardcore and you can always tell when they felt actually threatened rather than just faking it a bit, because in the former case they go from 0 to 100 in an instant. There was no waffling around with this one, no vague excuses for why, in this case, troons shouldn't ask for it, like women usually do. Just flat out "troons aren't women, period."
>>27011 the same applies to jews
>>25413 Bless your soul anon Doing the god's work
>>27011 Thank you for telling the truth. Right-wingers INSTANTLY jump on any perceived accord with women as if it’s some huge win. FUCK NO, Women will push for the tranny shit relentlessly four social status, it’s only when it threatens THEM, directly, do they suddenly go THAT’S FOR WOMEN FUCK OFF. Those same women will gleefully Karen you to death if you had the exact same stance on trannies taking whatever is left for men. So, no, never be for trannies getting women status but also DO NOT suck feminist dick over it.
>>25413 They are intentionally detonating the post 2008 obama order to save the New World Order and Zionism, as they view the current paradigm they created as outdated. You'll get less blatant in your face sex perversion and minorities; in return you will see the transhumanist project accelerate and more engineered anti-social behavior.
>>27376 women have been taking from men for decades. Conservative men are such fucking retards they celebrate feminism's wins. They deserve to be enslaved (circumcised, drafted, divorce-raped)
(509.37 KB 1206x1668 IMG_5024.jpeg)

>>25324 Good. All life, including humans, has 1 goal and 1 goal only; to reproduce. Troons can’t reproduce. With deductive reasoning, troons are not human.
>>25413 This means nothing. If I had a penny for every time a /pol/ poster got things wrong, I could probably buy something in a dollar shop
(124.43 KB 294x388 1717350574974724.png)

>JK Rowling won Feminists won, you mean. I'm not a feminist. Are you?


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply