I was reading this thread on 4chan. Does anyone have these instructions? https://boards.4chan(Please use archive.today)/pol/thread/477567893/pol-you-are-absolutely-pathetic >>477572700 "Also 90% of the responses are not humans. I saw that in a thread once too. The picture posted by op had specific instructions about how to respond and only about 3 people did it. The rest were not humans answering because they couldn’t grasp the instructions."

The CEO of Racism wants an update on our progress, so I'm calling a meeting. First up for discussion is our outreach program. I generally minister to conservatives but conservatives have a few psychological problems that make them very poor dissidents. The worst being their knee jerk anti-activism response. Should we be expanding our outreach program to leftists as well? Is it possible to not only get White leftists to stop being anti-White but to evolve into White advocates? They are certainly better cut out to, you know, actually doing things beyond typing online. But they also come with a lot of baggage. Up next, we need to go over the quarterly report. Has the state of Racism improved? The recent election in France and the expansion of AFD shows that at least Racism-lite has great potential. President Trump may win the election in America as well. Is this good for our company? I believe that he is a net benefit because he helped create black race riots and these are our best advertisements. Lastly, we need to talk about the elephant in the room, our competitors; The Jews. Is a Trump win good or bad for the jews? Are the jews going to withdraw their support from the left due to the recent non-khosher attitudes towards Palestine? And if this happens, will this open up the market for Racism-tech to gain new members from the left? Should we discuss Palestinian issues more or is this a dead end? If Trump doesn't win, will this be bad for Racism? Joe Biden is also polarizing. And we have seen a rise in White organizations that far exceeds what happened under Trump. Whoever wins, we need to get ahead of our competitors . I'll open the floor. Anon, you look like you have something to say?

(((Ivan Illich))) Get a load of this: https://infogalactic(Please use archive.today)/info/Tools_for_Conviviality >The idea of the 'radical monopoly' is also applied to the effects of cars on the urban form, as "speedy vehicles of all kinds render space scarce." Ivan Illich contributes to a radical critique of modern urbanism: "this monopoly over land turns space into car fodder. It destroys the environment for feet and bicycles. Even if planes and buses could run as nonpolluting, nondepleting public services, their inhuman velocities would degrade man's innate mobility and force him to spend more time for the sake of travel." So, to put it simply, the reason why we need to destroy the concept of the automobile (And ANY form of travel by extension, which includes planes,trains, and ships) is because said vehicles "dehumanize" society.

The idea that the CIA serves as the "narrative of last resort" suggests that in situations where the federal government or other institutions are unable to maintain control or coherence, the CIA could step in to provide the final, authoritative narrative, particularly in matters of national security and intelligence. This concept reflects the agency's role as a key player in gathering and interpreting information, as well as its capacity to act independently in extreme circumstances. In practice, the CIA's role as the "narrative of last resort" would likely manifest in scenarios where conventional governmental functions are severely compromised or where immediate, decisive action is required to address threats that other branches of government are unable to manage effectively. The agency's access to critical intelligence, its ability to operate covertly, and its mandate to protect national security position it as an entity that could shape the understanding and response to crises when other mechanisms are failing. However, viewing the CIA as the ultimate arbiter of truth or the final narrative in such situations comes with significant implications. While the agency might be able to provide continuity and stability in the face of governmental collapse or severe dysfunction, this concentration of narrative control also raises concerns about accountability, transparency, and the potential for abuse of power. The CIA is traditionally designed to operate behind the scenes, providing information and support to elected officials who then make policy decisions. When it becomes the "narrative of last resort," it implies a shift from a supporting role to a more central, perhaps even dominant, position in determining the course of events. This shift could lead to a scenario where the agency's interpretation of events becomes the prevailing narrative, potentially sidelining other perspectives or democratic processes. Moreover, the idea of the CIA as the final narrative suggests a scenario where traditional checks and balances have broken down. In a healthy democratic system, multiple institutions—such as the Executive Branch, Congress, the judiciary, and the free press—contribute to the formation of national narratives, each providing different viewpoints and ensuring that no single entity holds unchecked power. The notion of the CIA as the "narrative of last resort" reflects a situation where these institutions may no longer be functioning effectively, leaving the intelligence community to fill the vacuum. In summary, while the CIA could indeed act as the "narrative of last resort" in extreme circumstances, this role would come with significant risks and challenges. It underscores the importance of maintaining robust, resilient democratic institutions that can uphold a balanced and transparent process for determining national narratives, ensuring that no single agency becomes the sole arbiter of truth, especially in times of crisis.

Men throughout history have observed that women never become as mature as men do, forever being stuck in an awkward stage between adult and child. Schopenhauer famously remarked on this, to cite one particularly poignant example in his essay “On Women”. I feel that the recognition of this is a key component of the final redpill. Women are just big babies, and should be treated as such for the entirety of their lives. The only way to resolve the woman question is to put women back in diapers, stop their nagging with a pacifier and provide them entertainment truly suitable to their nature such as princess cartoons and toys. All women shall become the “little princesses” of their man, who shall be caretaker and husband. Women shall be happy, pampered and carefree. The Natural Order shall be restored.

RIGHT WING TRANSLATION SQUAD Kikes exposing themselves This thread is dedicated to translating a video where jews expose how they view every goy as subhuman. The post contains a file with the English subtitles in SubRip format and the video with the subtitles removed. A subsequent reply will be made with the original videotape. Let's get this into as many languages as possible. Sieg Hail

According to retard-politics, if you like the working class, you vote left. If you like big business, you vote right. But this is changing. White people, who still make up a majority of the electorate, are the only race that splits the vote almost 50-50 between parties. The primary reasons why some White people vote for the Democrats is because many 20th century people still believe that somehow the Democrats are better for labor unions. But this is changing. It is now just accepted that union members vote for Trump because immigration is killing them. And now, the leader of one of the major unions, Teamsters, spoke at the RNC. In the early 20th century, all American labor unions opposed immigration. Denis Kearney, the leader of the Workingmen's party, advocated driving both capitalists and Chinese out of the country. The American Federation of Labor fought hard to exclude Mexicans from the country and close the borders. Once labor unions officially switch to the party now associated with anti-globalism and anti-immigration, which is the only logical thing for them to do, then the only faction of White people left on the left will be the deraigned lunatics of antifa and the degenerate faggots and trannies. Why does this matter? The Republican party is not pro-White. They are zionists. This is true. However, detangling White people from the confusion of splitting our vote and loyalties is a first baby step on the path to a true White party. It is conceivable that in the future, ~80% of White people will vote for the Republicans as ~80% of non-Whites vote for the Democrats today. It is conceivable that in the future, a true pro-White party or faction within the GOP will play the key role in determining if they win elections. And if we hold the key to Republican victory or defeat, even if it is only in local elections, they will be forced to stand up for some White interests or lose electorally. This is a very good thing. We need the labor union block to join us. They are the final piece of sane White people needed to form a more perfect union.

There has been an insane level of online censorship over the past 7 odd years, to the point where it wouldn't be inaccurate to suggest that the West is currently mentally and politically enslaved by Big Tech bureaucrats. >4chan ultra policed by woke jannies who spam the website with blacked and sissy porn whilst IP banning anyone who talks about politically relevant topics or current events >Reddits systematic mass banning of any subreddit to the right of Stalin or even mildly critical of wokeism or mass immigration >Wayback Machine/Internet Archive removing websites and twitter posts for politically incorrect content >Omegle being shut down after a sexual abuse lawsuit with no online replacement for popular aad hoc anonymous questions and discussion >Cloudflare and GoDaddy taking down websites hosted on their servers because they arbitrarily disagree with the social or political views of the website owners >PayPal freezing the accounts and assets of people who run or pay for online stores linked to people or organisations they disagree with (aka conservative libertarian or nationalist groups) >Wikipedia openly cherrypicking authoritative from non authoritative sources solely based on the political bias of the newspaper or publication, essentially smearing non Leftwing political figures as unilaterally "Far Right" then locking the ability to edit pages >Youtube's heavy censorship, and manipulation of the algorithm to hide politically controversial (i.e. non anti-white, non-left wing, anti-immigrant) channels and keep them from getting recommended to new viewers >Google's blatant political partisanism in its site and image search results, and more recently its ventures into AI (Black Vikings) >The extreme level of censorship in online video games, to the point where any form of swearing or discussion beyond the realm of the game is often met with a permanent account ban like in World of Warcraft Fortnite or League of Legends >Multiple countries including Australia Sweden UK and Germany passing anti Free speech Orwellian "online hate speech laws" that allow people to be arrested for what they say or display online, even if they aren't committing any act of violence or terrorism >Cancel culture mobs all over twitter resulting in people being deplatformed from Universities and even fired or blacklisted from jobs All of the above and more I haven't mentioned only began happening in the years since Donald Trump was elected. Its part of a massive censorship campaign began by figures in the Big Tech industry to completely and utterly drown out the dissenting voices of people who disagree with the current Anti-White woke pro-immigration agenda. There probably has never been such a fast decline from freedom of information to censorship like this in all of human history. The ultimate problem with the vast majority of social issues in the West stems from the fact we can no longer have open and salient debates about said issues or reach constructive solutions to them because we are now hyperreliant on the internet for communication and information and an unaccountable array of bureaucrats and administrators linked to the Big Tech industry are actively squashing our ability to interact with it. They are the number one enemy of free speech on planet earth, and are the reason Britain is still infested with Pakistani child rape gangs, the reason why Mexican cartels and Somalians are overrunning Texan and Irish country towns, the reason why women aren't being held to account for insanely degenerate behaviour thats lead to a generation of childless people and a future of demographic decline, failing healthcare and a lonely, sick, aging population. The reason why mass immigration continues unabated despite the massive social and financial problems it has been causing the West and East Asia, not to mention the existential questions.

This video goes over many reasons why people aren't having children. In short, it is not due to wages or inflation. Ultimately, it is modern lifestyle. Countries with high degrees of traditionalism like China, Japan, or Thailand are experiencing the same degree of child collapse as Poland or France. It's not even feminism per-se which is the problem. It is simple economics. Studies show that families with fewer children do better than families with more children. In the modern world, most people do not farm and thus most people do not need many children to help them. Maybe the issue can be solved by removing females from the work force. Yet how can this even be realistically accomplished? It's easy to say, >Oh yeah, we're totally going to just take power and say "No more women in work." But I think you know this is unrealistic. Am I wrong? How do we realistically raise the birthrate? https://(Webm, use an alternative platform, or use https://instances.invidio.us/)/5TgABxa-S2A

This board needs more moonman.

A thread for asking and answering questions that aren't important enough to make an entire thread for them.

fuck this

Is disclosure the biggest political issue of our time? Are there entirely new laws of physics at play that are also being exploited by negative actors? What are the new physics? Is there a hyperspace that can be controlled by consciousness and consciousness-related technology? What is the new technology? UFOs? Telepathic AIs? Reality manipulation technology? Who has this technology or abilities? Black projects? 3D Aliens? 4D Aliens? Are Americans being targeted?

Anybody remember Mr.bond and want a place to listen to all his songs? https://argentbeacon(Please use archive.today)/music/mr-bond/ there ya go

10 years ago, we had nigger race riots, Obama was the president, Tea Party cuckservatism had died, and we were all just beginning to coalesce into the modern "alt-right." I foolishly believed that we were on the course for a pro-White mass movement. In retrospect, that was naive. We were totally inexperienced in politics and the potential for a mass movement was crushed in 2017. Since then, we have kind of just coasted along. I don't know how we can motivate people. Z00mers are among the biggest disappointments. I had hoped that they would carry the torch for us, but the based ones were too few in number. The degenerates are running the show and TikTok is nothing but niggers, it's easy to believe that niggers are 80% of the population based on TikTok. There are plenty of pro-Whites out there but we're disconnected, disorganized, and weak compared with the enemy. I figured that maybe the country might have collapsed if we did not rise up and become a political force. But this too never materialized. Apparently, the inertia of the past 200 years is enough to keep the regime going even though this degree of dysfunction would cave capsized any normal country.

Art Bell Ghost To Ghost Channel https://www.bitchute(Please use archive.today)/channel/u12Uzdri2vfg/ 1994-10-28 Art Bell Ghost To Ghost Full https://www.bitchute(Please use archive.today)/video/ZKYl6hwQgWNA/ 1995-10-30 Art Bell Ghost To Ghost https://www.bitchute(Please use archive.today)/video/rGBFOswD0JLu/ 1993-10-30 Art Bell Ghost To Ghost