>>1128309
>>1128325
Postal 4 will never be good because the very premise of it's existence sucks
If it was just bad mechanically, like clunky or buggy or something
which it is, but that's besides the point that could be fixed in due time
But you can tell from the writing and the gameplay direction itself that their very plans suck from the bottom up, and that can't be fixed with any amount of years of tweaking the spaghetti
They're trying to recreate Postal 2 almost like people who didn't make Postal 2 but rather some unrelated people who only played it and got the jist of the superficial aspects of the game, as opposed to everything under the surface that made it fun
>They made fun of current events, we should too!
No, they wrote whatever was crazy and assholish and rude enough to be fun, it just so happened to BE current events at the time, it doesn't need to be now
>They had postal dude in a sexual outfit, we should do the same!
No, they just had him end up in a wacky situation that just so happened to be a sexual outfit, it doesn't need to be
>They made the game a chore simulator, we should have it be the same!
No, they just chose the most fitting game to get their vision across, which happened to be a chore simulator, it doesn't need to be one, find your vision first and then work around it
>They had a silly genitalia related mascot so WE also need a silly genitalia related mascot!
NO NO NO!
Start thinking in terms of themes and courses of action, try and remember your mindset AS you made Postal 2, not just copying the STUFF from Postal 2
Goddamit