>>5258 idk they liked and accepted gays online at a time when fagbashing was still widely socially accepted, and that reputation stuck

Probably in the earlier days of the fandom/community. I wasn't around in the early days, but from what I hear it started out in a similar niche to science fiction communitie- >you're too afraid of jail to carry your internet rage out in person. You're really a bunch of intolerant dicks, honestly. lol sure

>>5258 A lot (if not all) of the early members of the PROTO-furry fandumb were nerds, a few ghey. And nerds were always historically put upon. So, naturally, the unspoken Rule 0 was "we don't bully here". Of course, there is the simple fact that humans are hypocrites, and just because you were bullied does not mean you are not a shit person capable of the same thing and worse. And of course, the far left that is trying hard to "own" Furry now, is nothing but individually weak collectivist thugs. Fagoneer is one of them. That was my serious response, feel free to troll.

>>5258 >you're really a bunch of intolerant dicks but OP you yourself are intolerant of pedophilia, as you just said. doesn't that make your whole point invalid? i know, you're gonna say >but its pedophilia! the worst thing ever! the rules that i just said should apply universally do not apply to this one thing because! and that makes you a hypocrite, like every other faggot in this forsaken planet. but its fine you see, thats just nature. might makes right and if the ruling power of the world wanted it to be normalized then it would be just like within the furry fagdom, the rules are as they are because a higher power (im not talking about magic here, im talking about higher in the hierarchical sense) allows it to, namely, the left. my point is, you're a niggerfaggot that should learn how the world really works.

>>5417 Why is this "Let me school you, naive child, on how the world REALLY works" monologue always comes from frustrated failures? Also, if might makes right is the sole principle of "the universe", then I can just kill you, Mr Pedo, and not bother with an explanation. Pray to Darwin I don't come across you IRL.

>>5423 scawy

>>5423 >Also, if might makes right is the sole principle of "the universe" your thinking is too narrowminded. might DOES make right, but its not as simple as comparing the might of me vs you, there's the might of groups, the might of tools, the might of wealth, etc. >hurr pedo evil i kill u yeah see, you're shielding yourself in the might of public opinion. you're fully aware that in a physical fight between a pedo and a non pedo the population will be on the side of the non pedo and probably help, which makes the nonpedo side stronger, hence might making right. you wouldn't threat murder if you were in a minority group faced with a force larger than yours. truth is always what the majority of the population/the strongest want to believe in, even if its not objectively truth. >why does this always come from frustrated failures because happy successes don't need to think about these deeper concepts of logic and morality, you've already won so you just go through life enjoying your victory without much need for deeper thought. also calm down janny, im just pointing out the hypocrisy of the whole "you're intolerant dicks!" line. going through this branch of reasoning was necessary to do so, but thats about it. OP is a faggot, picture unrelated.

>>5258 > Pedophilia is rampant, if anyone openly speaks out against it they're turned against by the masses. ????????????? this is a literal contradiction, try saying you're a pedophile or draw cub art on furry Twitter and see how quickly you get cancelled lmao

I hate how puritan furries are now, this TF doesn't even make sense (how does the underwear disappear?). Just draw the human naked, you can even just leave him genital-less if you want... but instead of just letting people be naked, we have to have people wearing stupid underwear that for some reason only applies to humans and not furries. Nominu is much better at this...

>>10324 Are you sure he's not just catering to twitter's content algorithms by drawing it SFW?

>>10324 The only furry site I know that does not allow human NSFW is Inkbunny (not counting e621's anti-loli/monster girl thing). I never did understand why IB still has that policy, if only to prevent oversaturation of loli art, not that it ever could have been worse than the oversaturation of AI that's there now.

>>10486 >I never did understand why IB still has that policy It's because the site's owner is from the UK.

>>10487 That would explain a no-loli policy (though IB is the one place that still allows cub) and that ID thing that was being talked about a few months ago, but not a blanket restrictions on all human NSFW content.