>>30 I'll answer as best as I can, but keep in mind it's only my opinion and is subject to change if /who/res disagree. I'm trying to please everyone here. >is irony and sarcasm taken as bannable shitposting? Nah. It wouldn't really be /who/ without those, would it? >is waifufagging allowed? (it might be a good idea to make a waifufag general containment thread if so) At long as it doesn't shit up other threads. So yeah, if people want to create a Clala General be my guest. >is getting into thread-derailing debates allowed so long as it's relevant to Who? I don't see why not. >are social threads allowed? Sure. >is marthabong-like (ironic/joke) "lore"posting allowed? Yes. It's more canon than ChibWho anyway. >is shitting on/trolling particular subgroups like moffspergs, tennantfags etc allowed? It's just bantz, mate. Of course it's allowed. >is consoomer posting allowed (e.g buyfag generals, battlestation sharing, etc)? Yeah sure, as long as you're not advertising your Etsy here. >Some of the current rules are pretty vague like "Low-quality posts will result in a ban". I'll be honest here, this one is 100% a bastard, catch-all rule. It's because I wanted to avoid naming the usual suspects. But basically, it means quoting half the people in a thread to say "Clyde Langer", "lol bbc" jokes and "I hate it! I hate it!" garbage will get you banned. I guess this rule should be renamed "Don't be an obnoxious cunt or get banned."

>>31 Seems fair, thanks for clarifying.

>>32 No problem anon. I updated rules 7 and 8: https://8chan.moe/whogen/rules.html 8 is now "Don't be an obnoxious cunt or get banned", which is still vague, but it is what it is. I guess it's on par with 4chan's "This post is extremely low quality."