>>9692
What is there to think about? Where the fuck is that dude's foot? And his hands? The hooves look weird, too.
This algorithm definitely shows some kind of "understanding" of what's being asked for, but it doesn't have a "model" (if you will) of what's being asked for. The astronaut has no feet, no hands, and three arms. To general intelligence, it's recognizable, but on close scrutiny, it falls apart. What the fuck kind of Lovecraftian horror am I looking at? I'm probably missing things about the horse, but am too ignorant of horses to comment on them.
It's got a way to go. I'm not really into AI programming, but could we at least make an adversarial model so that the result has to match a model of the target? Our three-armed, no-handed, no-footed astronaut wouldn't be generated, because that doesn't match a model of a human? Just a thought, but it's probably stupid shit, cause I don't know shit for AI.