/lit/ - Reading and Writing

Fine Literature, and or pulp trash

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

8chan.moe | 8chan.st | 8chan.cc | Onion | Redchannit
Test123

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


(85.51 KB 862x1345 GdImFCvW0AAoxom.jfif)

/PG/ - Philosophy General Scribe 04/19/2025 (Sat) 20:37:10 No. 827
Discuss any and all things philosophy. Query: for anyone familiar with Neo-Kantianism, how can they jettison Kant's thing-in-itself and not fall into a subjective idealism akin to Berkeley or Fichte? I'm not too familiar with the movement, I've read some Cassirer and Vaihinger, and I understand that Neo-Kantianism is mainly concerned with epistemology and has an aversion to metaphysics, but the removal of the ding an sich seems pretty metaphysical to me...
What's a good book for a beginner? >inb4 start with the Greeks I tried reading The Republic and got filtered,
>>831 Existentialism by Robert Solomon. It's a starting point that you can latch onto since it involves the philosophy of the present times. A textbook should give an overview a wide variety of subjects, but instead of the usual glazing and dismissal the book is just an anthology of primary source material and some brief introduction. I doubt I would've studied phil without it.
>>831 I've read the Republic. It's interesting, but it is also very long. Most of Plato's dialogs are much shorter. The go-to starting point for Plato back in antiquity (at least according to a certain neoplatonist named Iamblichus) was Alcibiades I. After that Gorgias and then Phaedo. You can look up the rest of his list if you want to read more.
>>827 I'm pretty far into philosophy what's a good place for philosophy of mind and hermeneutics respectively? I'm reading John Searle for mind but want to go deeper.. And hermeneutics seems to always filter me


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply