>>17081 Yes

>>17083 >>17081 Seriously, this fetish is like the horseshoe theory, those who like are part of both extremes. From what I've seen, on one side you've literal troons who are fucked in the head; And on the other, you've white nationalists who get off seeing their women fuck niggers due to taboo.

Who cares? why do people keep cluttering about a porn board like this with meta analysis threads all the time? There's been multiple threads of people typing this same shit here. If you don't want to post or watch or discuss interracial stuff from an erotic perspective than just leave. I don't go to the /zoo/ board on this site and go: "Hey guys, what this all about? Can you give me a thesis on the relation of one's Jungian shadow archetypes to horse fucking"? Yet people constantly come here to "want to understand" why people like this stuff. Shut up and jerk off and stop expecting people to reassure you that you don't actually like what you're watching.

I was a far right nationalist who often gang stalked faggots after coke benders on clubs and beat the shit out of them with other buddies from the gym. After the multiple terrorist attacks on Europe and the decision of the Europeans not to engage in "hate" and "not looking back in anger" i became disenfranchised with my identity, what i felt who i was. No one was doing anything, the far right was encased in a fart box watching 5 hour livestreams of their designated milquetoast alt right e-whores. The left was winning ground and politics is a lie. I started getting aroused at the decay. Jerking to an article led to a picture, to a video, to a specific category to a specific word. Most of us have been watching behadings since our parents gave us phones. I'm completely desensitized and hardly hold anything dead other than me and my health.

>>17087 Truth. I come here just for the porn, because the amateur stuff is just really good. I really don't understand the obsession with race.

I consider myself to be a relatively normal, but above masculine and attractive guy. I do very well with women IRL, I am financially successful, go to the gym, and am happily married. I've never had racist views, never had far left winged views either. I'm not even politically active because I consider it a waste of time and mental energy. I've been hooked an BBC/cuckolding/hotwifing porn for like 6 years now. I know that watching too much porn got me into this stuff, but I do think it's kinda strange that all the other fetishes I had previously came and went like flavors of the month, while this one for some reasons sticks around. Ever since I got it 6 years ago, it stuck. I personally really don't like the humiliation part at all, and think that stuff like BNWO is extremely cringy and pathetic. My hypothesis is that this might be because I am not actually a loser in real life. It makes sense to me that primarily people who have very little self esteem will fall for a fetish like that. I am just a dude with a too high testosterone level who brainwashed myself into wanting to see my wife ride a bbc, I guess...

>>17092 The problem with a lot of people within this fetish and way of life is they seem to think they can pretend to be something they are not. You see it with grifters posing as women, women as sissies, old as young, youg as old... And when someone is crafting some elaborate backstory on who?, what? and when? ends up showing a lack of self awareness only seen in fan fiction. Learn how people actually write and talk about their experiences, try to listen to yourself when you speak and maybe you'll be able to lie semi decently on the internet.

OP is made for BBC

>>17081 Created by a load of liberal white people, salivating in a cuck way. BNWO might actually destroy the black race if a backlash is generated over time..

>>17097 Are you trannies actually so delusional that you genuinely cannot believe a relatively normal person can also develop a fetish?

>>17110 When you write it like a fan fiction, yes. You yourself seem to be the one who can't come to terms with this fetish not being filled with trannies. Just go do some writting and come back when you have something better.

>>17114 Haha dude, wtf...? I said that I go to the gym, own my own business, and do fairly well with women, and you find these things so hard to believe that you refuse to accept that I am real and label me as "fiction"? Bro.., no offense, but..., what a super ultra loser do you have to be to not even be able to comprehend that someone like me might even EXIST? Can you..., just for funs sake, perhaps post a picture of what you look like IRL?

>>17118 You seem both defensive and upset, my man but i guess I'll bite to give you satisfaction

>>17119 You and everyone else that reads this thread knows that what I say is the harsh truth, and all you do is try to steer away the conversation in 2 ways 1. you ignore the point I make, and resort to saying that I am upset 2. you try to turn it into a joke with the pic you posted The sheer fact that you did those things instead of actually reply to the point I made is such rock solid evidence that I completely and utterly destroyed you. Which is funny if you think about it. Because now, you are not just a loser IRL, but you are a loser online as well. And not just 'online' in general, but even on THIS PLACE. The worst, most degenerate place of all. Even here, you are the loserest of the losers.

>>17126 the reason you aren't getting the response or argument you want is because general internet culture has progressed away from straw man arguments and other logical fallacies. I don't even respond to people like that at all anymore, I just move on to the next thread or discussion. You end up either arguing in a circle or moving so far away from the original point that the replies don't even make sense anymore. Usually people like you have some type of agenda when you respond aggressively and you're not really concerned about the topic at hand but you just want to rant or argue about ideology. If you want to troll or fight online you need to think up new tactics. Or at least reply in earnest and have a genuine discussion, which is just as satisfying imo.

>>17127 trolling is a art

>>17132 Trolling commonly refers to the art of upsetting people for the sake of it. What I did is upset you by presenting you the truth. Very important distinction. Calling someone a "troll" whenever you run out arguments is such a classic (but pathetic) way of trying to cope with a loss in an online argument. Doing this marks your 3rd attempt to steer away from the argument... I understand that I brought my argument in a passionate way, which might be considered offensive to a lot people, and that therefore it's easy to label me as a troll that is trying to piss people off. But the real reason you are triggered is not because I am a troll. It's because the truth hurts. That's why. >>17127 The way that your comment is written makes it very hard to understand whether you are attacking me or the other guy.

>>17133 >Trolling commonly refers to the art of upsetting people for the sake of it yup

>>17139 Oh wait, I get it, you are now (after you realized that you've lost the argument) claiming that YOU were trolling ME all along? Really..., you are now resorting to the "hahah... I-I was trolling all along!! I wasn't actually serious!!" tactic....? Bro... That is your 4th attempt at steering away from the argument. It's getting a little pathetic... I already concluded that you are a loser, but this... Do you actually think anyone here is going to believe you? Do you believe yourself? Is that what it is? Is this one of those psychological phenomena where you are using coping strategies where you lie to yourself to make yourself feel better?

>>17081 >Soyjak party zoomers Nah. I'm not a soyjak but i know them, they don't do that kind of shit. For the simple reason that soyjaks party zoomers have a social life and friends, unlike you bunch of incel weeb losers. Otherwise for the rest yes, it's a mix of /pol/tards and troons of 4chan behind this stuff. Now i consider them like the same entity, because a lot of /pol/tards are secretly troons and a lot of troons are secretly /pol/tards. People who create pro-BNWO threads are often the exact same people who create anti-kikes, anti-troons and anti-niggers threads. These fat schizos coom on BNWO videos but afterwards they have regrets, they feel ashamed for done that. So after creating a BNWO thread they create an anti-kikes, anti-troons or anti-niggers thread to vent their anger. It's just schizophrenia. I hacked a /pol/fag once and his computer was FULL of interracial porn and troon porn lmao, real shit.

>>17144 Makes sense, people love to jerk off to taboo shit. There are so many bbc threads being made by trannies on /pol/, eventually it gets some people hooked in (Mostly lonely coomers).

>>17088 That's actually very interesting, you've put into words exactly how I feel towards all this. I specifically get off to the degradation and depravity of this fetish, how fucked up the idea is. It doesn't have to be black guys, it has to be completely ruined women

>>17081 homosexual spics in cock cages ruined the fetish for everyone