>>311019
The difference, my dead Shillston, is that Disrespectful Nod targeted Gawker because of years of shady practices, countless violations of journalistic ethics and the fact that it's filled to the brim with terrible people. It also didn't target a specific person, but a conglomerate.
What you're proposing is ganging up against a guy because of his opinions. If his bigotry made him unfit for the job he has, like in the case of that Mustafa bitch, I'd consider supporting your idea, but it's not the case now, is it?
He may be a total cunt, but as long as he makes good games, there's no point in trying to get him fired. Of course, if he makes a bad game, we might boycott it, and let the free market do the rest. And if he makes a bad game, fills it with his anti-white vitriol and gets critical acclaim for it, that's when we give him the ZQ special. As we always did.
You may try and confront him on twitter if you don't like him, I won't stop you.