>>827
The first part sounds good, though people would most likely try to tread the line between what's "suggestive", what's "particularly suggestive", and what's just too much, just to fuck around.
The second part doesn't sound too bad, though I'm away at work most of the day and having to browse on the phone at work, it'd make me a bit wary.
Overall, it's a relatively good balance between allowing or forbidding explicit content, but because of
my personal situation, I'd find it better if explicit things on those threads were to be posted elsewhere and linked, just like on /sthg/. Explicit things weren't really so prominent (thankfuly) and it wasn't that much of a problem to link them, on there. It's up to you.