>>26840
>>26843
>>26842
I feel the thread is overlooked so far in the catalog. It's counter intuitive that a thread with activity is not bumped.
>>26841
That'd be great anon. I'm not sure how long the video is, but you're gonna have a very hard time cramming a lot of time into a few megabytes of size. So focus on the good part, and make it maybe 30 seconds to a minute long. In terms of video codec, you want vp9 with double pass as it'll come out 30-50% smaller for the same quality. If you're using constant quality, try a CRF around 33 or so, and perhaps lower the resolution to 720p. 60 FPS videos eat a ton of video size. Hopefully your audio codec/bitrate isn't awful, but you can try something like opus at 80K or something. And the output should be webm.