Okay but what if ids where cyclical, like every 12 hours it would change

>>31197 Maybe

>>31197 no, id rather eat a 15min timer each time i want to post

>>31197 What if they changed every post but there was a special hash only board volunteers could use to discover who's who?

>>31215 It wouldn't help with the samefag >>31213 I see so you're not willing to compromise

>inb4 multireply faggot blah but the thread STILL jumps to the bottom everytime you reply, i cant be bothered to deal with this shit >>27391 this is so sad, imagine spending your time doing this >>27445 now this is an idea i can get behind, at least not everyone gets punished for one spammer. but like >>27478 says it has to be implemented so that its hard to abuse. >>29232 would work too. >>27592 my guess it that /a/ still has a lot of oldfags or people who are here because they dont want the super clean internet experience they get everywhere else. reading trough all the posts kinda confirms that. >>29831 im really wondering what kinds of boards you even visited >>29933 anon you could have ignored them without ids too >>29966 im asking for those to be deleted desu >>30202 i just thought that the red of the id is kinda fitting (are the colors the same for everyone?) >>30874 no me too anon. and the colors have personality wich is not helping >>30301 if you hate imageboards that much, why are you even here. the only thing i kind of can get behind are mobiles.

>>31221 Actually, how about they exist, but they're turned off by default and an user has to turn them on to see them? And it's on a per-thread basis? Essentially most everyone would forget they exist, but if someone gets really paranoid they can turn them on.

>>31227 >And it's on a per-thread basis? If you mean the ids yeah every thread you get assigned a different id

>>31234 I meant that the option to see them is on a per-thread basis. So there's a checkmark at the top of each thread that's off by default that the user can turn on manually.

>>31227 >they're turned off by default and an user has to turn them on to see them I think this may be the best compromise for making everyone happy.

>>30183 >>30710 There are anons who have only felt the negatives what were supposed to be the trade-off for the positives. Trying to say that only shitposters want IDs gone is just wrong. There are threads where anons were talking about the actual topic instead of talking about the users of those threads prior to IDs getting introduced. This whole threads is the proof of that, it's the attempt to consolidate the shit flinging about the IDs to one place instead of having some of it in every thread.

>>31235 Be honest with you, every anon seems so self conscious given the option they would probably turn on the ids, afraid of other people seeing their ids

>>31242 i feel like this is unbalanced, we had the ideas earlier that the ids reset after a time or that you can vote to see a posters id/other posts, those are more "fair" i think

>>31197 How about this: if the thread's too fast, like a general, it automatically enables on that thread?

>posting with id Fuck off niggers. You might as well start flag posting with your cuntry

BO should just do a coin flip and that would decide if ids go or stay

>>31221 The proposal may address other people's concerns but does not address mine. Calling it a compromise feels like an attempt to wave aside the drawbacks of IDs pretending they cannot be reasoned with. Acceptable compromise might be thread specific enabling of ids or hiding IDs but with the option to reveal ID when enough users vote for it. Something where IDs need not be revealed as a default and only when there are suspicions of bad actors

>>31223 based multireply faggot >>30899 the fool speaks the truth but the wise don't want to listen >>30301 how's the weather at langley/tel aviv? actual 4cuck oldfags would have burned the place down if IDs were introduced it's all so tiresome...

>>31227 how is that different at all? that's purely cosmetic

>>31272 chinatsu chan

>>30301 Test

>>31277 holy kek is that icon for phoneposters? haven't seen it before

If I wake up tomorrow and there's an /a2/ I think I'll know why

IDs are something for users, since volunteers/mods see you nopan anyway. So what is the benefit of IDs? To recognize samefags more easily. So what if your ID is hidden default, but each user get one chance per thread to reveal the ID of somebody if they mark 5 posts or so of the supposed samefag. Could scale with post count/activity, could have it then revealed for everyone. Abusable in the sense that samefags or bot armies could reveal anybody's ID if it were revealed for everyone else.

>>27445 Something like this would be neat

>>31275 Yes, but it changes it from opt-out (have to edit CSS) to opt-in. Causing most people to forget or never learn they exist. Also it seems like the most feasible idea to implement than the elaborate ideas other people have. >>31282 It's just the emoji for a mobile phone. I may be the first person to figure out that this place has emojis enabled.

>>31260 thread specific ids wont stop samefags and it wont be popular enough. people against it will just go back to 4chan anyway. might as well create a non-id board

>>31298 did i do it right

>>31306 You have to manually type out 'Anonymous'

>>31298 I knew as well I just never used them 😂

>>31301 IDs are already thread specific

>>31301 >>31319 I just realised you meant toggleable per thread ID's, ignore me I suck cocks

>>31298 >>23599 shame. would be based if the mods added icons for phoneposters. wink wink. also, all emoji posters should be shot on sight.

>>31298 >Causing most people to forget or never learn they exist come on, give them a little more credit

>>31007 No because even now, 8chan is too slow, my thread watcher rarely updates with new posts, only /vg/ actually fully migrated here.

>>31298 uhhh test >>31325 sure man I think it would be funny