>>37052 Maybe find a more relaxing hobby, la~? How about bird-watching, la~?

>>37053 LOL, that said, I do watch the birds out the window on occasion, we have a bird feeder set up la~

>>37054 https://librti.com/view-video/canada-the-illusion >Canada is (legally) just a corporation, like the East India Company was la~

>>37055 https://librti.com/view-video/sos-administrative-state-in-bc-canada >BC officially goes full nucom-tyranny la~

>>37053 I have been 'having fun' with Grok, trying to interpret obscure texts, my X account was already 'flagged' for this activity la~

>>37057 How does the CNMI differ from a state like Hawaii? The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) differs from a state like Hawaii in several key ways: Political Status: CNMI: A U.S. commonwealth, not a state. It has a covenant with the U.S. granting self-governance but under U.S. sovereignty. It’s considered an unincorporated territory, meaning not all U.S. Constitution provisions apply. Hawaii: A fully incorporated U.S. state, the 50th state, with complete representation and constitutional protections. Representation in Congress: CNMI: Has a non-voting delegate in the U.S. House of Representatives but no representation in the Senate. Hawaii: Has two voting U.S. Senators and two voting Representatives in Congress. Voting Rights: CNMI: Residents are U.S. citizens but cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections. Hawaii: Residents have full voting rights in federal elections, including for president. Federal Laws and Autonomy: CNMI: Has more autonomy over local laws, like immigration and labor (until recently controlled locally). Some federal laws, like minimum wage, apply differently or with exemptions. Hawaii: Fully subject to federal laws with no special exemptions, like any other state. Geography and Economy: CNMI: A chain of 14 islands in the western Pacific, with a smaller population (~50,000). Economy relies heavily on tourism, gaming, and federal aid. Hawaii: An archipelago in the central Pacific with a larger population (~1.4 million). Economy is diverse, including tourism, agriculture, and military bases. Cultural and Historical Context: CNMI: Indigenous Chamorro and Carolinian cultures, with a history of Spanish, German, Japanese, and U.S. influence. Became a U.S. commonwealth in 1976. Hawaii: Native Hawaiian culture, with a history of monarchy, U.S. annexation (1898), and statehood (1959). In short, CNMI is a U.S. territory with limited federal integration and representation, while Hawaii is a fully integrated state with complete U.S. constitutional rights and obligations. What constitutional rights and obligations is the CNMI not subject to? The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), as an unincorporated U.S. territory, is not subject to all constitutional rights and obligations that apply to states like Hawaii. The differences stem from its status under the 1976 Covenant with the United States and U.S. Supreme Court precedents like the Insular Cases. Here’s a breakdown of key distinctions: Constitutional Rights Not Fully Applicable: Voting Rights: CNMI residents, while U.S. citizens, do not have the right to vote in U.S. presidential elections, a privilege guaranteed to state residents under the Constitution’s framework for federal elections. They lack voting representation in Congress (no Senators, only a non-voting House delegate), unlike states with full representation under Article I. Equal Protection and Due Process: The Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment) applies in the CNMI, but courts have interpreted its application flexibly due to the territory’s unique status. For example, local laws distinguishing between CNMI citizens and other U.S. citizens (e.g., land ownership restrictions) have been upheld, which might not pass muster in a state.

[Expand Post]

Some due process protections (5th and 14th Amendments) may be limited in scope, depending on federal court rulings, as not all constitutional provisions are deemed “fundamental” in unincorporated territories. Jury Trials: The right to a jury trial in civil cases (7th Amendment) and certain criminal cases (6th Amendment) does not automatically apply in the CNMI unless explicitly extended by federal law or local statute. Local courts may operate differently from federal or state courts. Full Bill of Rights Application: Not all Bill of Rights protections are guaranteed in unincorporated territories like the CNMI. For instance, the Supreme Court has held that only “fundamental” rights (e.g., free speech, basic due process) apply automatically, while others (e.g., Second Amendment right to bear arms) may not unless Congress or courts extend them. Constitutional Obligations Not Fully Applicable: Federal Taxation: Unlike states, the CNMI is not fully subject to federal income tax obligations for all residents. Under the Covenant, CNMI residents pay local taxes to the CNMI government instead of federal income taxes in many cases, though U.S. citizens there may still owe federal taxes on non-CNMI-sourced income. The CNMI has authority to create its own tax system, an autonomy states lack under the Constitution’s uniformity clause (Article I, Section 8). Federal Labor Laws: Certain federal labor obligations, like the minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act, historically applied differently or with exemptions in the CNMI. While federal minimum wage now applies, the transition was phased in gradually due to economic considerations, unlike in states where it’s uniformly enforced. Immigration and Customs: Until 2009, the CNMI controlled its own immigration system under the Covenant, exempt from federal immigration laws (a power states lack under Article I, Section 8). While federal immigration law now applies, some transitional provisions remain unique to the CNMI, unlike states fully subject to U.S. immigration authority. Commerce Clause: The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) gives Congress broad authority over interstate commerce, but its application in the CNMI can be modified by the Covenant. For example, the CNMI had exemptions for certain trade and labor practices (e.g., garment industry regulations) that would be unconstitutional restrictions in a state. Land Ownership Laws: The CNMI restricts land ownership to persons of “Northern Marianas descent,” a policy permitted under the Covenant but which would likely violate equal protection or privileges and immunities clauses (Article IV, 14th Amendment) if attempted by a state. Legal Framework Explaining Differences: The Covenant (1976): This agreement outlines the CNMI’s relationship with the U.S., granting it significant local autonomy (e.g., over immigration, labor, and land laws) while placing it under U.S. sovereignty. It explicitly limits certain constitutional applications to balance local needs with federal authority. Insular Cases Doctrine: Supreme Court rulings (1901–1922) established that unincorporated territories like the CNMI are not guaranteed the full scope of constitutional rights unless Congress extends them. Only “fundamental” rights apply inherently. Congressional Authority: Under the Territory Clause (Article IV, Section 3), Congress has plenary power over territories, allowing it to tailor which constitutional obligations apply to the CNMI, unlike states bound by the Constitution’s federal-state balance. Caveats: Some rights and obligations have been extended to the CNMI over time by Congress or federal courts (e.g., Social Security, federal minimum wage). The exact scope of constitutional applicability can evolve based on legislation or judicial interpretation, but the CNMI remains distinct from states due to its territorial status. In summary, the CNMI is not subject to the full range of constitutional rights like presidential voting, uniform federal representation, or certain Bill of Rights guarantees, and it has exemptions from obligations like federal taxation, uniform labor laws, and immigration controls that states must follow. These differences reflect its unique covenant-based relationship with the U.S. and its status as an unincorporated territory.

>>37058 Who qualifies as a person of Northern Marianas descent? A person of Northern Marianas descent (NMD) is defined under the Constitution of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and related laws, primarily for purposes like land ownership and certain political rights. The definition is outlined in Article XII of the CNMI Constitution and clarified by subsequent legislation and court interpretations. Here’s the breakdown: Key Criteria: Ancestral Connection: A person qualifies as being of Northern Marianas descent if they are of Chamorro or Carolinian ancestry, or a combination thereof, with historical ties to the Northern Mariana Islands. This includes individuals who can trace their lineage to Chamorro or Carolinian inhabitants of the CNMI at the time of significant historical benchmarks, such as before or during the Spanish, German, Japanese, or U.S. administration periods. Specific Definition: According to Article XII, Section 4 of the CNMI Constitution, a person of Northern Marianas descent is: Someone who was born or domiciled in the Northern Mariana Islands by 1945 (a key date tied to the end of World War II and U.S. administration) and is of at least one-quarter Chamorro or Carolinian blood, or a combination of both. Their direct descendants, regardless of where they are born, provided the ancestral link is maintained. The definition also includes individuals adopted by a person of Northern Marianas descent, under certain conditions (e.g., adoption before the age of 18). Citizenship and Residency: Historically, eligibility was tied to those who were citizens or nationals of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (pre-1976) or who became U.S. citizens under the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth (1976). Residency in the CNMI is not strictly required for descendants to qualify, but the ancestral connection must be verifiable. Practical Application: Land Ownership: Article XII restricts the acquisition of permanent and long-term interests in real property (e.g., freehold or leases over 55 years) to persons of Northern Marianas descent. This protects indigenous control over land, a culturally and economically significant issue in the CNMI. Verification: The CNMI government, through agencies like the Office of the Attorney General or designated boards, may require documentation (e.g., birth certificates, genealogical records) to confirm NMD status for land transactions or other purposes. Legislative Clarifications: Laws like the Northern Marianas Descent Act have refined the definition over time, addressing edge cases (e.g., adoption, mixed ancestry). Notes: The one-quarter blood quantum requirement has been debated for its exclusivity but remains in place to balance cultural preservation with practical governance. Non-NMD U.S. citizens in the CNMI can still lease land for shorter terms (up to 55 years) but cannot own it outright. The definition does not typically include other ethnic groups (e.g., Filipino, Chinese) unless they meet the Chamorro/Carolinian ancestry criteria through verifiable lineage. In summary, a person of Northern Marianas descent is someone with at least one-quarter Chamorro or Carolinian ancestry tied to the CNMI’s historical population, or their direct descendants, as defined by the CNMI Constitution and laws. This status is critical for land ownership and certain civic roles in the CNMI. For precise verification, individuals may need to consult CNMI legal authorities. Isn't that racist? The question of whether the Northern Marianas descent (NMD) definition under the CNMI Constitution is racist is complex and depends on perspective, intent, and legal context. Let’s break it down: Why It Could Be Seen as Racist: Blood Quantum Requirement: The use of a "one-quarter Chamorro or Carolinian blood" criterion explicitly ties eligibility to ethnicity, which can resemble racial classifications. Policies based on race or ethnicity often raise concerns about discrimination, especially when they exclude others (e.g., non-Chamorro/Carolinian U.S. citizens) from rights like land ownership. Exclusionary Impact: Non-NMD residents, including other U.S. citizens (e.g., Filipino, Chinese, or Caucasian residents), cannot acquire permanent land interests, potentially creating unequal treatment based on ancestry. In a state, such a law would likely violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Historical Parallels: Blood quantum laws have been criticized in other contexts (e.g., Native American tribal enrollment) for perpetuating colonial-era racial categories and marginalizing those who don’t meet arbitrary thresholds.

[Expand Post]

Why It Might Not Be Considered Racist: Cultural Preservation: The NMD definition aims to protect indigenous Chamorro and Carolinian communities, who faced centuries of colonization (Spanish, German, Japanese) and land loss. In small island economies, land is a finite resource tied to cultural identity. Supporters argue this isn’t racism but a safeguard against cultural erasure, akin to protections for Native American or Native Hawaiian lands. Legal Context: The CNMI’s Covenant with the U.S. (1976) explicitly allows this restriction, approved by Congress and CNMI voters. As an unincorporated territory, the CNMI isn’t subject to the full Equal Protection Clause as states are. Courts have upheld similar indigenous protections in territories (e.g., Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1992), prioritizing local autonomy over strict equality. Not Targeting Race Broadly: The policy focuses narrowly on Chamorro and Carolinian ancestry, not race in a broader sense (e.g., it doesn’t exclude based on being Asian, White, or Black but on specific indigenous lineage). It’s less about racial superiority and more about historical stewardship of land. Broader Considerations: Intent vs. Effect: The intent is to preserve indigenous rights, not to oppress other groups, but the effect can feel discriminatory to non-NMD residents who are otherwise equal U.S. citizens in the CNMI. This tension is common in indigenous rights debates globally. Comparative Examples: Similar policies exist elsewhere, like Native Hawaiian homestead programs or tribal land restrictions in the U.S., which also use ancestry-based criteria. These are often defended as restorative justice rather than racism, though they face legal challenges. Evolving Standards: Critics within the CNMI have questioned the blood quantum rule, suggesting alternatives like residency or cultural ties. However, changing it risks diluting indigenous control, a sensitive issue in a region where outsiders could dominate land ownership. Legal and Ethical Nuance: In a state like Hawaii, such a law would likely be struck down as unconstitutional (e.g., violating equal protection or privileges and immunities clauses). But the CNMI’s territorial status and Covenant carve out an exception, reflecting a negotiated balance between U.S. law and local needs. Ethically, it’s a tradeoff: protecting a vulnerable indigenous minority versus ensuring equal treatment for all citizens. Whether this is “racist” hinges on whether you prioritize historical redress or universal equality. In short, the NMD definition can be viewed as racist due to its ethnic exclusivity and unequal treatment, but it’s defended as a non-racist measure to preserve indigenous culture and land in a unique legal context. The debate reflects broader tensions between indigenous rights and anti-discrimination principles. If you’d like, I can dig into specific CNMI court cases or compare it further to Hawaii’s policies for more clarity.

Several countries do not impose recurring annual property taxes on land or real estate, though other fees, such as transfer taxes or stamp duties, may apply at purchase or under specific conditions. Below is a list of places where you can buy land without ongoing property tax obligations, based on available information. Keep in mind that tax laws can change, and local regulations or other costs (like municipal fees) may still apply. Consulting a local expert before purchasing is advisable. Countries with No Annual Property Taxes Cayman Islands No annual property taxes for residents or non-residents. Foreigners can own land, but a stamp duty (typically 7.5%) applies at purchase. Popular for its stable economy and luxury real estate market. Monaco No annual property tax for homeowners. Foreigners can buy property, though the market is extremely expensive. A transfer tax (around 4.5–7.5%) applies during purchase. Malta No recurring property tax on owned real estate. Foreigners (including non-EU citizens) can buy property, with some restrictions on multiple properties. Stamp duty (typically 5%) is payable at purchase. United Arab Emirates (UAE) No annual property taxes in emirates like Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Foreigners can own land in designated freehold areas. A transfer fee (e.g., 4% in Dubai) and occasional municipal fees may apply. Qatar No annual property taxes. Foreigners can buy in specific areas (e.g., The Pearl-Qatar). Registration fees or lease-related costs may arise. Bahrain No property taxes on land or buildings. Foreigners can own property in certain zones. A 2% stamp duty applies, reducible if paid promptly. Oman No annual property taxes. Foreigners can buy in integrated tourism complexes.

[Expand Post]

A 3% transfer fee to the Housing Ministry applies. Kuwait No property taxes for residents or non-residents. Foreign ownership is limited, often requiring a local partner. Minimal registration fees may apply. Saudi Arabia No annual property taxes, but a 2.5% “white land tax” may apply to undeveloped urban land zoned for residential or commercial use. Foreign ownership is restricted but allowed in certain cases (e.g., with government approval). A 5% real estate transaction tax applies on sales. Turks and Caicos Islands No annual property taxes. Foreigners face no restrictions on buying land. A stamp duty (6.5–10%, depending on property value) is payable at purchase. Dominica No annual property taxes. Foreigners can buy land freely. Government fees or stamp duties apply during transactions. Fiji No property tax on freehold land (less than 10% of land is freehold). Foreigners can buy freehold land or leasehold with approval. Transfer fees or stamp duties may apply. Cook Islands No property taxes. Foreign ownership is possible but often requires government consent. Leasehold arrangements are common, with associated costs. Liechtenstein No annual property tax, though notional income from property may be included in income tax calculations. Foreigners face significant restrictions on buying land unless tied to economic benefit (e.g., business investment). Capital gains tax (0–24%) may apply on property sales. Croatia No annual property tax, except for owners of holiday homes, where a minimal “ceremonial” tax applies (5–15 kuna per square meter). Foreigners (including non-EU citizens) can buy with approval. A 3% real estate transfer tax applies. Sri Lanka No annual property taxes. Foreigners can buy with restrictions (e.g., approval required, limits on agricultural land). Stamp duties or notarial fees apply at purchase. Vanuatu No property taxes, income taxes, or capital gains taxes. Foreigners can buy land, often leasehold. Transaction fees or stamp duties may apply. Faroe Islands No annual property taxes. Foreign ownership is possible but may require residency or special permission. Minimal transfer or registration fees apply. Notes and Considerations Other Costs: Even in countries with no property taxes, one-time fees like stamp duties, transfer taxes, or registration costs are common. Some places may have municipal fees, rental income taxes, or taxes on undeveloped land (e.g., Saudi Arabia’s white land tax). Foreign Ownership Restrictions: Many of these countries allow foreigners to buy land, but restrictions may apply (e.g., specific zones in the UAE, approval in Liechtenstein, or leasehold-only in Fiji). Always verify local laws. Tax-Free Status Isn’t Absolute Ownership: Some argue that without property taxes, you “truly own” your land, but governments can still impose other obligations (e.g., eminent domain, usage regulations). Verification: Tax policies can shift, and enforcement varies. For example, Cambodia has a negligible 0.01% property tax that’s rarely collected, but it’s not listed above as truly “tax-free.” Sources: This information aligns with reports from sites like Nomad Capitalist, Global Citizen Solutions, and International Man, which discuss tax-free property ownership. No U.S. States Qualify In the United States, no state is entirely free of property taxes, as they fund local services like schools and infrastructure. Some areas in Alaska (e.g., certain municipalities) may not levy property taxes, and exemptions exist for seniors or disabled veterans, but these are exceptions, not the rule. Recommendation If you’re seeking to buy land without property taxes, consider your goals (e.g., investment, residency, lifestyle). The Cayman Islands, UAE, and Malta are accessible for foreigners with stable economies, while places like Fiji or Vanuatu suit those seeking remote, low-cost options. Always consult a local real estate lawyer or tax advisor to confirm current laws and total costs. Would you like me to dig deeper into any specific country or region?

>>37060 What areas in Alaska can I buy land and not pay property taxes? 1 post 15 web pages In Alaska, property taxes are levied by organized boroughs and municipalities, but some areas—particularly those outside these jurisdictions—do not impose property taxes. These are typically within Alaska’s Unorganized Borough, which covers about half the state’s landmass and includes remote regions with minimal local government services. Below are specific areas and considerations for buying land without property taxes, based on available information and critical analysis. Areas in Alaska Without Property Taxes Unorganized Borough (General) The Unorganized Borough spans vast, sparsely populated regions, including parts of western, interior, and northern Alaska. It’s not a single entity but a collection of areas without borough-level government. Examples of Regions: Aleutians West Census Area, Bethel Census Area, Nome Census Area, Dillingham Census Area, and parts of the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area. Why No Taxes?: No local government exists to impose property taxes, as there’s little infrastructure (e.g., no schools, fire departments, or paved roads in many cases). Considerations: Land is often remote, accessible only by boat, plane, or snowmachine. You’d need to be self-sufficient for water, power, and emergency services. Check specific parcels, as some areas may fall under small municipal jurisdictions with taxes. Port Alexander A small community on Baranof Island in Southeast Alaska, within the Unorganized Borough. Tax Status: No annual property taxes, as confirmed by local reports, due to its lack of organized municipal government. Land Availability: Limited but possible to buy lots or homes. The area is remote, accessible primarily by boat or floatplane. Lifestyle: Offers fishing, hunting, and a temperate rainforest climate. No roads connect it to other towns, so self-reliance is key. Expect high costs for supplies due to transportation. Other Specific Communities Delta Junction Area (Outside City Limits): Some land outside Delta Junction’s municipal boundaries, in the Unorganized Borough, avoids property taxes. Verify parcels, as nearby areas may fall under the Fairbanks North Star Borough, which taxes. Tok and Glennallen: These are near or within the Unorganized Borough. Tok, for example, has no borough taxes, though small local fees may apply if within city limits. Glennallen’s surrounding areas are often tax-free but check for Copper River Basin jurisdiction overlap. Manley Hot Springs: Mentioned in discussions as a low-tax or no-tax area due to its remote location in the Unorganized Borough. Land is available, often for agriculture or off-grid living. Nenana (Rural Areas): Outside Nenana’s city limits, land in the Unorganized Borough may have no property taxes. State land auctions sometimes offer parcels here for farming or homesteading. State Land Auction Areas Alaska’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR) periodically sells land in remote areas, many within the Unorganized Borough, via auctions or over-the-counter sales. Examples: Parcels near Lake Louise, Slana, or Trapper Creek have been offered in past auctions, often in tax-free zones. Process: Check DNR’s website (dnr.alaska.gov) for current offerings. Land is typically undeveloped, and buyers must confirm tax status, as some parcels may border taxable boroughs. Note: Even without property taxes, expect fees like survey costs or annual assessments if the land is under a state lease before full ownership. Key Considerations Verification is Critical: Tax status depends on precise location. A parcel near a borough or city boundary (e.g., near Anchorage or Fairbanks) might still be taxed if it’s annexed. Use Alaska’s Mapper tool (mapper.dnr.alaska.gov) or contact the State Assessor’s Office to confirm.

[Expand Post]

Trade-Offs: No property taxes often mean no services. You’ll likely lack paved roads, utilities, schools, or emergency response. For example, in Port Alexander, residents rely on rainwater and generators. Shipping costs for supplies can be steep—sometimes equating to tax savings in expense. Other Costs: Even without property taxes, you may face: State Fees: Land bought through DNR auctions may have one-time or financing fees. Federal Taxes: If you earn income from the land (e.g., rentals), federal taxes apply. Local Quirks: Some communities, like Tok, might charge minimal fees for voluntary services (e.g., fire protection), though not technically taxes. Ownership Process: Foreigners and non-residents can buy land in Alaska without restrictions. Options include private sales, state auctions, or homesteading-style purchases. Financing may be harder for remote parcels—many buyers pay cash. Legal Risks: Without local government, disputes (e.g., property boundaries) can be trickier to resolve. Ensure clear title and survey records. Some argue “no taxes” doesn’t guarantee “true ownership” if state or federal regulations still apply (e.g., environmental restrictions). Why Alaska’s System Allows This Alaska’s unique tax structure stems from its vast size and low population. Only 14 of 19 organized boroughs levy property taxes, and municipalities like Anchorage or Fairbanks handle their own. The Unorganized Borough, covering 323,000 square miles, generates little revenue potential, so taxing it isn’t practical. The state offsets this with oil revenue and dividends (e.g., the Permanent Fund Dividend, $1,702 per resident in 2024). Critics note this setup favors self-reliant lifestyles but leaves remote areas vulnerable to underfunded services, like schools or healthcare. Practical Steps Research Land: Use real estate sites like Zillow or LandWatch for private sales, or check DNR’s land sale program for state offerings. Confirm Tax Status: Contact the Alaska Division of Community and Regional Affairs (commerce.alaska.gov) or a local title company. Provide parcel details to verify no borough or municipal taxes apply. Visit the Site: Remote land can have unseen issues (e.g., poor drainage, as noted in Nenana). Camping or scouting, as one buyer planned, helps assess suitability. Plan for Costs: Budget for off-grid setups (solar, wells, septic) and transportation. A pallet of plywood in remote Alaska can cost thousands. Consult Experts: A real estate agent or attorney familiar with Alaska’s Unorganized Borough can navigate quirks like easements or access rights. Final Notes Port Alexander stands out as a confirmed no-tax community, ideal for those seeking coastal solitude. For broader options, focus on the Unorganized Borough—places like Tok, Manley Hot Springs, or state land near Slana offer flexibility for off-grid or agricultural use. Always double-check tax status, as boundaries shift, and “no tax” claims can be overstated if a nearby municipality expands. Would you like me to narrow down specific parcels or provide contacts for land auctions in a particular region?

>>37061 What are Alaska's homesteading laws and how do they apply to Prince of Wales Island? Is buying property tax free land on Prince of Wales Island possible? 15 web pages Alaska’s Homesteading Laws Alaska no longer offers traditional homesteading programs where individuals can claim free or low-cost land by living on and improving it. The federal Homestead Act of 1862, which allowed settlers to claim up to 160 acres, was extended to Alaska in 1898 but repealed nationwide in 1976, with a 10-year extension for Alaska until 1986. The last homestead patent in Alaska was granted in 1988 to Kenneth Deardorff for 80 acres on the Stony River. Today, Alaska’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages state land sales, but these are not homesteading in the historical sense. Current programs include: Remote Recreational Cabin Sites (RRCS): Alaska residents can stake a parcel (5–20 acres) in designated areas, lease it for five years while building a cabin, and then purchase it at appraised value. This is not free land, and non-residents are ineligible. Sealed-Bid Land Auctions: Open to residents and non-residents, these sell state land at fair market value. Parcels are often remote, with minimum bids based on appraisals. Over-the-Counter Sales: Unsold auction parcels can be bought at wholesale prices, but non-residents only qualify if no resident bids. No programs allow “proving up” land for free by building and living on it, as historical homesteading did. Veterans may receive a 25% discount on state land purchases (once in a lifetime, excluding development costs). Critique: The end of homesteading reflects Alaska’s shift from encouraging settlement to managing land for revenue and conservation. Some argue this limits opportunities for self-reliant lifestyles, while others see it as protecting public lands from exploitation. Native corporations and federal holdings (e.g., 222 million acres by the Bureau of Land Management) further reduce available private land, keeping less than 1% of Alaska privately owned. Homesteading Laws and Prince of Wales Island Prince of Wales Island, in Southeast Alaska’s Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, is subject to the same state land laws. No active homesteading programs exist on the island. Land ownership is complicated by: Federal and Native Land: Much of the island falls under the Tongass National Forest (managed by the U.S. Forest Service) or is owned by Alaska Native corporations like Sealaska or village corporations (e.g., Klawock-Heenya). These entities rarely sell land outright, often leasing it instead. State Land: Limited state-owned parcels may be available through DNR auctions or over-the-counter sales, but none are designated for homesteading-style programs on the island. Private Land: Most purchasable land is privately owned, listed through real estate agencies like Prince of Wales Island Realty or Zillow. These are market-rate transactions, not subsidized or free. The Remote Recreational Cabin Sites program has not recently included parcels on Prince of Wales Island, with past offerings focusing on areas like the Interior or Kenai Peninsula. Even if available, RRCS requires residency, payment, and development, not a “claim and improve” model. Critique: The lack of homesteading on Prince of Wales Island frustrates those seeking affordable land, especially given its road system and milder climate compared to Alaska’s Interior. However, Native land rights and federal conservation priorities limit state control, reflecting tensions between development and cultural preservation. Is Buying Property Tax-Free Land on Prince of Wales Island Possible? Prince of Wales Island does not offer universally property tax-free land, but tax status depends on jurisdiction and location: Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area: This unorganized census area has no borough-wide property tax because it lacks a borough government to levy it, unlike organized boroughs like Anchorage or Fairbanks North Star. However, incorporated cities within the census area may impose their own taxes. Incorporated Cities: Cities like Craig, Klawock, and Thorne Bay have municipal governments that often assess property taxes to fund services (e.g., schools, roads). Rates vary but are typically low compared to mainland U.S. For example, Craig’s mill rate is around 6–8 mills (0.6–0.8% of assessed value), per local listings and Alaska tax data. Unincorporated Areas: Outside city limits, in places like Coffman Cove, Whale Pass, or Port Protection, no municipal property taxes apply because these are unincorporated communities within the Unorganized Borough. Real estate listings for these areas often advertise “no property tax,” as seen in ads for Coffman Cove cabins or Port Protection waterfront lots. Examples of Tax-Free Areas: Coffman Cove: Listings highlight no property taxes, with flat, forested lots (e.g., 2.25 acres) ideal for cabins or small farms. Access to docks and stores makes it practical for off-grid living. Port Protection: Remote waterfront properties are marketed as tax-free, appealing for privacy and fishing lifestyles. Naukati Bay and Whale Pass: These unincorporated areas also lack property taxes, with parcels ranging from 1–5 acres, often with road access and power potential. Caveats: Other Costs: Even without property taxes, expect state transfer fees, recording costs, or Native corporation lease fees if buying non-freehold land. For example, a 1% state transfer tax may apply.

[Expand Post]

Services Trade-Off: No taxes mean no municipal services. In Port Protection, you’d rely on rainwater, generators, and personal boats or planes for access. Supply costs can rival taxes in expense. Verification: Listings claiming “no property tax” may mislead if near city boundaries that could incorporate later. Check with the Alaska Division of Community and Regional Affairs or a title company using parcel details. Ownership Restrictions: Foreigners and non-residents can buy land, but Native corporation or federal land may require special permits. Some listings note development hurdles, like road platting for larger lots. Availability: Real estate sites like Homes.com and RE/MAX list dozens of lots in unincorporated areas, from 1.24-acre developed parcels in Coffman Cove to 2.7-acre waterfront sites in Port Protection, explicitly noting no property taxes. Prices range from $30,000 to $150,000, depending on size and access. State land auctions rarely include Prince of Wales parcels, so private sales dominate. Critique: The “tax-free” label is attractive but oversimplifies. Without taxes, you’re self-funding infrastructure, which can cost more than taxes in organized areas. Some see this as true freedom; others view it as a hidden burden, especially if isolation limits resale value. Native land ownership also raises ethical questions about buying in areas tied to indigenous heritage. Practical Steps for Prince of Wales Island Identify Unincorporated Areas: Focus on Coffman Cove, Port Protection, Naukati Bay, or Whale Pass for no-tax parcels. Avoid Craig or Thorne Bay unless you’re okay with municipal taxes. Search Listings: Use Prince of Wales Island Realty (powrealtyalaska.com), Zillow, or Land.com. Filter for unincorporated areas and confirm “no property tax” in descriptions. Verify Tax Status: Contact the Alaska DNR or a local title company with the parcel’s legal description. The Alaska Mapper tool (mapper.dnr.alaska.gov) helps confirm jurisdiction. Assess Access: Many tax-free lots lack roads or utilities. For example, a Port Protection lot may require floatplane access, inflating costs. Visit or consult locals, as listings may downplay challenges. Budget for Self-Sufficiency: Plan for solar, wells, or septic systems. A Coffman Cove listing noted deep soil for farming, but clearing stumps requires heavy equipment. Conclusion Alaska’s homesteading laws no longer provide free land, and Prince of Wales Island has no homesteading programs. You can buy land in unincorporated areas like Coffman Cove or Port Protection with no property taxes, as these lack municipal governments. Listings confirm availability, but isolation and self-reliance costs (e.g., shipping supplies) offset tax savings. Always verify tax status and access before buying, as boundaries and regulations shift. Would you like me to search for specific no-tax parcels on the island or provide DNR auction contacts? >The end of Homesteading signaled the end of the White American Dream la~

>>37062 Can I buy or create a business in Japan and sponsor myself for a visa? As a U.S. or Canadian citizen, you can buy or create a business in Japan and potentially sponsor yourself for a visa, but the process is rigorous and depends on meeting specific requirements. Below is a concise explanation of how this works, the visa options, and key considerations: 1. Buying or Creating a Business Buying a Business: Foreigners, including U.S. and Canadian citizens, can purchase an existing business in Japan without nationality-based restrictions. This could be anything from a restaurant to a tech startup. Due diligence is critical: verify the business’s financial health, legal status, and compliance with Japanese regulations. Engage a local lawyer or consultant, as contracts and liabilities may involve complex Japanese law. Ownership doesn’t automatically grant visa rights—you must meet visa criteria separately (see below). Creating a Business: You can establish a company in Japan, typically as a Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) (joint-stock company) or Godo Kaisha (GK) (limited liability company). A KK is more common for visa sponsorship due to its perceived stability. Capital Requirement: A minimum investment of 5 million JPY (approx. $33,000 USD as of April 2025) is required for the business to qualify for visa sponsorship. This must be verifiable (e.g., bank deposits). Registration involves setting up a company name, address, and articles of incorporation, often requiring a Japanese resident representative if you’re not yet in Japan. Costs range from 200,000–500,000 JPY ($1,300–$3,300 USD) for setup, excluding capital. You’ll need a business plan, office lease, and proof of operational intent (e.g., contracts, clients). 2. Sponsoring Yourself for a Visa The most relevant visa for self-sponsorship through a business is the Business Manager Visa (also called the Investor/Business Manager Visa). Eligibility Requirements: Business Scale: Your business must either: Have at least 5 million JPY in capital, or Employ at least two full-time employees (Japanese citizens or permanent residents, not including yourself). Operational Viability: Submit a detailed business plan showing profitability or sustainability. Immigration authorities scrutinize this heavily. Physical Office: A dedicated office space (not a virtual office or your home) is required. A lease agreement is proof. Your Role: You must actively manage the business (e.g., as CEO or director). Passive investment doesn’t qualify. Background: Relevant experience or education (e.g., business management, industry knowledge) strengthens your application. Application Process: Register your company with the Legal Affairs Bureau and obtain a Certificate of Incorporation. Gather documents: business plan, financial statements, office lease, proof of capital, your resume, and passport. Apply at a regional Immigration Bureau in Japan or, if abroad, through a Japanese embassy/consulate. You may need to enter Japan on a temporary visitor visa (90 days) to finalize the application. Processing takes 1–3 months. Approval grants a 1-year visa initially, renewable if the business remains viable. Self-Sponsorship Nuances: Your company sponsors the visa, but as the owner, you’re effectively sponsoring yourself. The business must be operational, not just a shell company.

[Expand Post]

Immigration may reject applications if the business seems unprofitable or exists solely for visa purposes. 3. Key Considerations U.S. vs. Canadian Citizens: No significant differences apply. Neither country has special bilateral agreements with Japan for this visa, so requirements are identical. Challenges: Language Barrier: Business setup and visa applications often require Japanese proficiency or professional translation services. Financial Risk: The 5 million JPY capital is a sunk cost, and failure to sustain the business can lead to visa denial/revocation. Scrutiny: Japan’s immigration is strict. Weak business plans or insufficient funds are common rejection reasons. Alternatives: If starting a business is too complex, consider a Skilled Labor Visa (if you have expertise), Spouse Visa (if married to a Japanese national), or Startup Visa (available in certain cities like Fukuoka for entrepreneurs testing ideas, though it’s temporary). Buying a business with existing visa sponsorship (e.g., employing others) may be easier than starting from scratch. Practical Steps: Hire a gyoseishoshi (administrative lawyer) or visa consultant to navigate paperwork and compliance. Ensure your business aligns with Japan’s market needs—random ventures (e.g., cafes in oversaturated areas) often fail scrutiny. Maintain meticulous financial records, as renewals require proof of tax payments and business activity. 4. Additional Notes Timeline: From business setup to visa approval, expect 3–6 months, assuming no delays. Residency Path: A successful Business Manager Visa can lead to permanent residency after 10 years (or 5 with consistent business success), though naturalization requires renouncing U.S./Canadian citizenship. Taxes: You’ll pay Japanese corporate and personal income taxes. Consult a tax accountant to optimize obligations. Risk of Failure: If the business folds, your visa status may lapse, requiring you to leave or switch visa types. Summary Yes, you can buy or create a business in Japan and sponsor yourself for a Business Manager Visa, provided you invest at least 5 million JPY or employ two full-time locals, maintain a real office, and prove business viability. The process is identical for U.S. and Canadian citizens, but it’s demanding—requiring capital, planning, and compliance. Professional help (lawyers, consultants) is highly recommended to avoid pitfalls. If you have a specific business idea or need details (e.g., costs, industries), let me know, and I can tailor further advice!

>>37063 Can I buy a rural home and farm in Japan and sponsor myself for a visa? As a U.S. or Canadian citizen, you can buy a rural home and farm in Japan, but sponsoring yourself for a visa based solely on owning property or farming is challenging due to Japan’s strict immigration rules. Below, I’ll explain the feasibility, visa options, and key considerations for your scenario. 1. Buying a Rural Home and Farm Property Purchase: Foreigners, including U.S. and Canadian citizens, can buy real estate in Japan without restrictions. This includes rural homes and farmland. Rural Homes: Properties in rural areas (e.g., Hokkaido, Tohoku, or Kyushu) are often affordable, with prices as low as $10,000–$50,000 USD for older homes due to Japan’s depopulation crisis. Check platforms like Akiya Japan or Inaka House for listings. Farmland: Buying agricultural land is possible, but restrictions apply. Since 2016, foreigners can purchase farmland directly, but local Agricultural Committees may scrutinize your intent to farm actively. You’ll need to prove you’ll live in Japan and farm the land (not just invest passively). Approval often requires Japanese residency (e.g., a visa). Process: Engage a real estate agent familiar with rural properties and a lawyer for due diligence. Rural deals may involve unique rules, like maintaining historical structures or community integration. Challenges: Akiya Properties: Many rural homes are abandoned (akiya) and may need significant repairs. Utilities (water, electricity) aren’t guaranteed in remote areas. Farmland Restrictions: Some regions limit land sales to non-residents or require farming experience. Japanese language skills or a local intermediary help navigate approvals. Taxes and Fees: Expect property taxes (low in rural areas), registration fees, and potential inheritance issues if buying old homes with unclear titles. 2. Sponsoring Yourself for a Visa Owning a home or farm doesn’t directly grant visa eligibility in Japan—visas are tied to activities like work, study, or family ties, not property ownership. Farming as a business could qualify you for a Business Manager Visa, but it’s not straightforward. Here’s how it works: Business Manager Visa (Self-Sponsorship via Farming): Requirements: Capital or Employees: Invest at least 5 million JPY (approx. $33,000 USD) in your farming business or employ two full-time Japanese citizens/permanent residents (not yourself). Viable Business: Submit a detailed business plan showing how your farm will generate profit (e.g., selling crops, livestock, or agritourism). Immigration authorities are skeptical of small-scale or hobby farms. Physical Office: A farm office (even a small one on your property) is needed, separate from your home. Active Management: You must run the farm yourself, not just own it. Relevant experience (e.g., agriculture, business) strengthens your case. Application: Register a company (e.g., Kabushiki Kaisha or Godo Kaisha) for your farm. Setup costs are 200,000–500,000 JPY ($1,300–$3,300 USD), plus the 5 million JPY capital. Gather documents: business plan, proof of capital, land purchase/lease agreement, your resume, and passport. Apply at a Japanese Immigration Bureau (often while in Japan on a temporary visitor visa) or embassy. Processing takes 1–3 months. Initial visa is 1 year, renewable if the farm shows progress (e.g., sales, tax filings). Challenges: Profitability: Small-scale farming (e.g., vegetables for local markets) rarely meets Immigration’s expectations for revenue. You may need a niche (e.g., organic produce, exports) or scale (e.g., multiple hectares). Land Ownership Timing: You may need to buy land after visa approval, as farmland purchases often require residency proof, creating a catch-22. Leasing land initially can bypass this. Scrutiny: Immigration may reject hobbyist farms or plans lacking clear financials. Consultants report frequent rejections for rural ventures without strong backing.

[Expand Post]

Other Visa Options: Skilled Labor Visa: If you have specialized agricultural expertise (e.g., viticulture, advanced techniques), you might qualify, but this requires employment by an existing Japanese farm, not self-sponsorship. Spouse Visa: If married to a Japanese citizen, you can live and farm without business requirements, but this doesn’t apply if you’re single. Startup Visa: Some rural areas (e.g., Fukuoka, Niigata) offer a 6–12-month Startup Visa for agricultural ventures, but it’s temporary and requires local government approval. It’s a test run, not a long-term solution. Permanent Residency: After 10 years of legal residence (or 5 with a successful business), you could apply for permanent residency, removing work restrictions. This is a long-term goal, not immediate. Why Farming Alone Doesn’t Work: Japan has no “investor visa” for passive land ownership or small-scale farming. Visas prioritize economic contribution, and subsistence farming rarely qualifies. Rural revitalization programs (e.g., JETRO incentives) encourage foreign investment but don’t directly grant visas. 3. U.S. vs. Canadian Citizens No Major Differences: Both face identical rules for property purchase and Business Manager Visa eligibility. Neither country has special agricultural agreements with Japan. Canadian Advantage: Canadians aged 18–30 can use the Working Holiday Visa (1 year) to test farming life in Japan, potentially working on farms to gain experience before buying land or applying for a Business Manager Visa. U.S. citizens lack this option. 4. Practical Considerations Feasibility: Rural Appeal: Rural Japan offers low costs and community support, but farming is labor-intensive, and markets are competitive. Research crops/livestock with demand (e.g., organic rice, wagyu beef). Community Integration: Locals may welcome foreigners revitalizing depopulated areas, but cultural fluency and Japanese language skills (at least N3 level) are critical for permits and relationships. Infrastructure: Ensure your property has water rights (vital for farming) and access to roads/markets. Remote areas may lack broadband or services. Risks: Visa Rejection: Weak business plans or insufficient revenue lead to denials. A farm must generate enough to support you and meet tax obligations. Financial Commitment: Beyond the 5 million JPY capital, expect costs for land, equipment, seeds, and repairs. Rural homes may need $10,000–$100,000 USD in renovations. Regulatory Hurdles: Agricultural Committees may block land sales if your farming intent seems unclear. Local politics can influence decisions. Support: Hire a gyoseishoshi (administrative lawyer) for visa and land applications. Firms like Tokyo Visa Support specialize in rural cases. Join programs like NALP (New Agricultural Land Program) or JETRO for guidance on rural investment, though they don’t guarantee visas. Connect with expat farmers via forums (e.g., Reddit’s r/JapanLife) for real-world advice. Timeline: Buying a home/land: 1–3 months with a good agent. Setting up a business: 1–2 months. Visa application: 1–3 months post-setup. Total: 3–8 months, assuming no rejections. 5. Alternative Paths Lease First: Rent farmland or join a farming co-op to gain experience and residency (e.g., via a work visa) before buying. This avoids upfront capital risks. Agritourism: Combine farming with a guesthouse or farm-stay business to boost visa eligibility, as tourism is seen as economically viable. Partnership: Co-own a farm with a Japanese citizen or established company to ease land purchase and visa hurdles, though you’d share control. Summary You can buy a rural home and farm in Japan as a U.S. or Canadian citizen, but sponsoring yourself for a visa requires turning the farm into a viable business under the Business Manager Visa. This demands at least 5 million JPY in capital, a solid business plan, and an operational farm—not just ownership. Farmland purchases may require residency, so leasing or starting small is safer. The process is identical for both nationalities, though Canadians have a Working Holiday option to explore first. Success hinges on profitability, local approvals, and persistence—rural life is rewarding but bureaucratically tough. If you have a specific region (e.g., Hokkaido) or farm type (e.g., rice, orchards) in mind, I can research further or check recent trends on X or the web. Want me to dig into anything specific?

>>37064 Can I buy or create a resort or onsen and sponsor myself and employ my family and friends for visas? As a U.S. or Canadian citizen, you can buy or create a resort or onsen (hot spring) business in Japan and potentially sponsor yourself for a visa. Employing family and friends to obtain visas for them is also possible, but it comes with strict requirements and limitations under Japanese immigration law. Below, I’ll outline the feasibility, visa options, and key considerations for both self-sponsorship and sponsoring others, tailored to your resort/onsen idea. 1. Buying or Creating a Resort or Onsen Buying an Existing Resort/Onsen: Foreigners, including U.S. and Canadian citizens, can purchase businesses like resorts or onsens in Japan without nationality-based restrictions. Rural areas (e.g., Hokkaido, Nagano, or Kyushu) have onsens for sale, often due to depopulation or aging owners. Prices range widely—$100,000 USD for small, aging facilities to millions for luxury resorts. Due Diligence: Verify the property’s legal status, water rights (critical for onsens), permits, and financials. Onsens require compliance with Japan’s Hot Springs Law (e.g., water quality, safety). Engage a lawyer and a real estate agent familiar with hospitality businesses. Challenges: Many onsens are old, needing renovations ($50,000–$500,000 USD). Existing staff may resist foreign ownership, and local permits (e.g., from municipal health departments) must be maintained. Creating a New Resort/Onsen: Starting from scratch is costlier and complex. You’d need to: Purchase land (rural plots are affordable, $10,000–$100,000 USD per hectare). Secure hot spring drilling permits (expensive and geologically uncertain—drilling can cost $500,000+ USD with no guarantee of a viable spring). Build facilities compliant with building codes and hospitality regulations (millions in investment for a modest resort). Business Structure: Register a company, typically a Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) or Godo Kaisha (GK). A KK is preferred for visa sponsorship due to its credibility. Setup costs are 200,000–500,000 JPY ($1,300–$3,300 USD), excluding capital. Capital Requirement: At least 5 million JPY (approx. $33,000 USD) is needed to qualify for visa sponsorship, but a resort/onsen realistically requires far more (10–50 million JPY or $66,000–$330,000 USD) for operations, staffing, and marketing. Market Considerations: Resorts and onsens thrive in tourist-heavy areas (e.g., Hakone, Beppu), but competition is fierce. Unique offerings (e.g., eco-resorts, foreigner-friendly services) help. Rural onsens can tap into Japan’s tourism boom (40 million visitors projected for 2025), but you’ll need Japanese language skills or local partners to navigate regulations and attract domestic guests. 2. Sponsoring Yourself for a Visa The primary visa for running a resort/onsen is the Business Manager Visa, allowing you to sponsor yourself through your company. Eligibility Requirements: Business Scale: Your resort/onsen business must either: Have at least 5 million JPY in capital (verifiable via bank deposits), or Employ at least two full-time employees who are Japanese citizens or permanent residents (not you or your family/friends on dependent visas). Viable Business Plan: Submit a detailed plan showing profitability (e.g., room bookings, onsen entry fees, dining revenue). Immigration scrutinizes hospitality ventures due to high failure rates. Physical Office: A dedicated office space (e.g., at the resort) is required, separate from your home. A lease or property deed suffices. Active Management: You must actively manage the business (e.g., as CEO or director). Relevant experience (e.g., hospitality, tourism, or management) strengthens your application. Compliance: Onsens require health and safety permits, and resorts need tourism licenses. Non-compliance risks visa denial. Application Process: Register your company with the Legal Affairs Bureau (1–2 months).

[Expand Post]

Gather documents: business plan, financial statements, office lease/deed, proof of capital, your resume, and passport. Apply at a regional Immigration Bureau (often while in Japan on a 90-day temporary visitor visa) or Japanese embassy. Processing takes 1–3 months. Initial visa is 1 year, renewable if the business shows progress (e.g., revenue, tax filings). Challenges: High Costs: A resort/onsen needs significant investment beyond the 5 million JPY minimum, including renovations, marketing, and staffing. Immigration expects a realistic scale. Profitability: Small onsens struggle to meet Immigration’s revenue expectations. A diversified model (e.g., lodging, dining, tours) improves chances. Rural Risks: Remote locations may limit customers, and infrastructure (e.g., roads, utilities) can be unreliable.

>>37065 3. Employing Family and Friends for Visas You can employ family and friends at your resort/onsen and sponsor their visas, but strict rules apply. The relevant visa for them would typically be a Work Visa (e.g., “Specialist in Humanities/International Services” for hospitality roles or “Skilled Labor” for specific skills). Sponsoring Their Work Visas: Eligibility: Job Relevance: Their roles must match visa categories. For a resort/onsen, common roles include: Management/Marketing: Requires a bachelor’s degree or 10+ years of experience (for “Specialist in Humanities/International Services”). Chefs/Artisans: Requires 10+ years of professional experience (for “Skilled Labor”). General Staff: Basic roles (e.g., cleaning, front desk) don’t qualify for work visas, as Immigration prioritizes Japanese hires for unskilled labor. Business Legitimacy: Your company must prove it’s operational (e.g., paying taxes, generating revenue) and financially able to support salaries (at least 250,000 JPY/month per employee, competitive with local rates). No Favoritism: Immigration may reject applications if it seems you’re hiring family/friends solely for visas. Their qualifications and the business’s need for their skills must be clear. Process: Obtain a Certificate of Eligibility (COE) for each employee through the Immigration Bureau. Submit their resumes, diplomas, job contracts, and your company’s financials. They apply for the visa at a Japanese embassy abroad using the COE. Processing takes 1–3 months. Initial visa is 1–3 years, renewable if employed and compliant. Limitations: Numbers: Small resorts (e.g., 5–10 staff) may only justify a few foreign hires. Immigration questions large foreign staff unless the business is substantial. Family Members: Spouses or children can’t work on Dependent Visas (see below) unless they secure separate work visas. Employing them directly for work visas is possible but scrutinized for nepotism. Unskilled Labor: Roles like housekeeping or basic service don’t qualify, limiting who you can sponsor. Alternative: Dependent Visas for Family: If you secure a Business Manager Visa, your spouse and minor children can apply for Dependent Visas, allowing them to live in Japan without working. Process: Apply with proof of relationship (marriage/birth certificates) and your financial stability. Takes 1–2 months. Work Restrictions: Dependents can request part-time work permission (up to 28 hours/week) for low-skill jobs (e.g., resort staff), but this isn’t a full work visa. Limitation: Dependent Visas don’t extend to parents, siblings, or friends—only spouse and kids under 20. Employing them under a work visa is better for full-time roles but requires meeting the criteria above. Friends: Friends must qualify for work visas based on skills/degrees, same as any employee. Immigration won’t approve visas for unqualified friends, and hiring too many foreigners raises red flags. They’d need contracts and proof of necessity (e.g., unique skills like English marketing for foreign guests). Key Constraint: Your resort/onsen must be profitable enough to justify multiple foreign hires. A small operation (e.g., 2–3 million JPY/year revenue) might only support 1–2 work visas beyond your own. Larger resorts (10+ million JPY revenue) have more flexibility.

[Expand Post]

4. U.S. vs. Canadian Citizens No Major Differences: Rules for buying businesses, self-sponsorship, and sponsoring others are identical for U.S. and Canadian citizens. Neither has special hospitality agreements with Japan. Canadian Advantage: Canadians aged 18–30 can use the Working Holiday Visa (1 year) to work in your resort/onsen temporarily or test the market before committing. U.S. citizens lack this option, so friends/family from the U.S. would need direct work visas. 5. Practical Considerations Feasibility: Onsen Appeal: Onsens are culturally unique and attract tourists, but they’re capital-intensive. Resorts (without hot springs) are easier to start but need strong branding to compete. Rural Opportunities: Depopulated areas offer cheap properties and government incentives (e.g., tourism grants), but customer access and staffing are challenges. Family Involvement: Employing family strengthens community ties, but their roles must align with visa rules. Dependent Visas for non-working family are simpler. Costs: Purchase/Setup: $100,000–$5 million USD, depending on size/location. Renovations add $50,000–$1 million. Visa Capital: 5 million JPY minimum, but 20–50 million JPY is realistic for a resort. Staffing: Salaries (250,000–500,000 JPY/month per employee) plus taxes and insurance strain small businesses. Ongoing: Onsen maintenance (water testing, heating) and resort marketing (e.g., to foreigners via Airbnb) are costly. Risks: Visa Rejections: Weak business plans or insufficient revenue lead to denials for you or employees. Immigration may doubt a small resort’s need for multiple foreign staff. Financial Failure: Resorts/onsens often lose money initially. If the business folds, all visas (yours and employees’) may lapse. Regulatory Hurdles: Onsen permits and tourism licenses require compliance. Local governments may resist foreign-owned businesses in conservative areas. Support: Hire a gyoseishoshi (administrative lawyer) for visa and business applications. Firms like Japan Visa Solutions handle hospitality cases. Use JETRO or local Chambers of Commerce for tourism grants and networking. Check X posts or forums (e.g., Reddit’s r/JapanFinance) for expat resort owners’ experiences. Timeline: Buy/setup business: 2–6 months. Self-sponsorship visa: 1–3 months. Employee visas: 1–3 months per person. Total: 6–12 months for full setup with 1–2 sponsored employees. 6. Alternative Paths Lease First: Rent an onsen/resort to test viability before buying. This lowers risk and helps build a business case for visas. Partnership: Co-own with a Japanese citizen or company to ease permits and visa scrutiny, though you’d share profits/control. Smaller Scale: Start with a guesthouse or B&B (lower capital, ~10 million JPY) and employ fewer people, scaling up later. Dependent Visas First: Bring family on Dependent Visas, then transition qualified members to work visas as the business grows. Summary You can buy or create a resort/onsen in Japan as a U.S. or Canadian citizen and sponsor yourself via a Business Manager Visa, requiring at least 5 million JPY capital and a profitable business plan. Employing family and friends for work visas is possible if they qualify (e.g., degrees, experience) for roles like management or marketing, but unskilled jobs don’t count, and Immigration watches for favoritism. Dependent Visas are easier for non-working spouses/kids. The process is identical for both nationalities, though Canadians have a Working Holiday edge. Success demands significant investment (likely 20–50 million JPY), compliance with onsen/tourism laws, and a sustainable business—rural locations are affordable but competitive. If you have specifics (e.g., location like Hakone, family size, or budget), I can refine the advice or check X/web for recent onsen sales or regulations. Want me to focus on anything particular?

>>37066 Marrying a woman remains the easiest way to immigrate anywhere... I suppose moving to Saipan is more realistic, although I couldn't own land being not 'the right race' la~

>>37067 Can I buy land in American Samoa as a USA citizen? As a U.S. citizen, you can buy land in American Samoa, but there are restrictions. American Samoa’s laws prioritize land ownership for native Samoans, defined as individuals with at least 50% Samoan ancestry. Non-natives, including U.S. citizens who don’t meet this criterion, face limitations: Communal Land: About 90% of land is communally owned and cannot be sold to non-natives. It’s managed by families or villages under customary law. Freehold Land: A small portion (around 10%) is freehold, which can be bought by non-natives, but transactions often require approval from the Governor or Land Commission to ensure compliance with local laws. Leasing: Non-natives can lease land, typically for up to 55 years, with approval from local authorities. You’ll need to verify the land’s status (freehold vs. communal) and navigate local regulations, often with legal assistance. Checking with the American Samoa Department of Commerce or a local attorney is advisable for current rules and specific parcels. Disclaimer: Grok is not a lawyer; please consult one. Don't share information that can identify you. What rights would I have in American Samoa vs. my home state of Alaska? Comparing your rights as a U.S. citizen in American Samoa versus Alaska involves differences in legal status, land ownership, political participation, and civil protections due to American Samoa’s unique status as an unincorporated U.S. territory and Alaska being a full state. Below is a concise breakdown of key rights differences, assuming you’re a non-native Samoan (i.e., not of at least 50% Samoan ancestry): 1. Citizenship and Status Alaska: As a U.S. citizen in Alaska, you have full citizenship rights under the U.S. Constitution, including equal protection, due process, and federal benefits. American Samoa: You remain a U.S. citizen, but American Samoa residents are generally U.S. nationals, not citizens, unless naturalized. As a citizen, you retain federal rights, but local laws and customs may limit certain privileges (e.g., land ownership) for non-natives. The U.S. Constitution doesn’t fully apply; for example, there’s no federal guarantee of birthright citizenship in American Samoa. 2. Land Ownership Alaska: You can freely buy, sell, or lease private land without ancestry-based restrictions, subject to standard state property laws. American Samoa: Land ownership is heavily restricted. About 90% of land is communal, reserved for native Samoans (50%+ Samoan ancestry). As a non-native, you can only purchase freehold land (roughly 10% of total land), subject to approval by the Governor or Land Commission. Leasing communal land is possible (up to 55 years), but also requires approval. These restrictions don’t exist in Alaska. 3. Political and Voting Rights Alaska: You can vote in local, state, and federal elections, including for U.S. President, Senators, and a House Representative with full voting power in Congress. You can also run for state office. American Samoa: You cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections, as American Samoa has no Electoral College votes. You can vote in local elections (e.g., for the territorial legislature), but as a non-native, candidacy for certain offices, like the Senate (Fono), may be restricted to native Samoans or long-term residents. American Samoa’s delegate to the U.S. House has limited voting power (only in committees). 4. Civil and Legal Rights Alaska: You’re protected by the full U.S. Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, and Alaska’s state constitution. Federal and state courts enforce these protections, covering free speech, religion, gun ownership (per state law), and trial by jury. American Samoa: Only parts of the U.S. Constitution apply, as determined by court rulings (e.g., “fundamental” rights like due process). Local laws, rooted in Samoan custom, may take precedence in areas like family disputes or land. For example, the right to a jury trial isn’t guaranteed in all cases, and Second Amendment rights are less clear due to local firearm restrictions. The High Court of American Samoa handles most legal matters, blending U.S. and Samoan legal principles. 5. Economic and Property Rights Alaska: You have unrestricted access to business ownership, property development, and state benefits like the Permanent Fund Dividend (if a resident for at least a year). American Samoa: Non-natives face hurdles in starting businesses tied to land use (e.g., agriculture) due to communal land restrictions. You can operate businesses on freehold or leased land, but local policies may favor native Samoans. There’s no equivalent to Alaska’s dividend program, and federal benefits (e.g., SSI) may not fully extend to American Samoa residents. 6. Residency and Cultural Integration Alaska: No cultural or ancestry-based barriers exist to establishing residency or integrating into civic life. American Samoa: While you can reside freely as a U.S. citizen, full integration into communal life (e.g., holding a matai title in the Samoan chiefly system) is generally reserved for native Samoans. Social and legal systems prioritize fa’a Samoa (Samoan customs), which may affect non-natives’ community standing. Practical Notes Mobility: In both places, you can freely travel, work, and access federal services as a U.S. citizen. However, American Samoa’s local governance gives it autonomy to regulate non-native activities, unlike Alaska’s state framework.

[Expand Post]

Legal Advice: For specific scenarios (e.g., buying property or starting a business), consult a local attorney in American Samoa to navigate territorial laws, as they differ significantly from Alaska’s. Alaska’s laws align with standard U.S. state frameworks, so legal processes there are more familiar to most U.S. citizens. Cultural Context: In American Samoa, respecting fa’a Samoa is crucial for social and legal interactions, unlike Alaska, where cultural norms are more diverse and less codified. If you have specific rights or activities in mind (e.g., voting, business, or firearms), I can dive deeper. Would you like me to focus on any particular area?

>>37068 I am a Alaskan citizen, compare my rights in Hawaii, CNMI, and American Samoa, how would they differ? 15 web pages As an Alaskan citizen, your rights stem from being a U.S. citizen in a fully incorporated state, where the U.S. Constitution applies in full. When comparing your rights in Hawaii, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), and American Samoa, the key differences arise from the legal status of each jurisdiction—Hawaii as a state, CNMI as an incorporated commonwealth, and American Samoa as an unincorporated territory. Below is a concise comparison of how your rights might differ in each place, focusing on voting, citizenship, legal protections, and local laws. 1. Hawaii Status: Hawaii is a U.S. state, like Alaska, so your rights as an Alaskan citizen are essentially identical. Voting Rights: You can vote in federal elections (presidential, congressional) if you establish residency in Hawaii, following state voter registration rules. You’d lose your Alaska voting rights if you change your domicile. Legal Protections: The U.S. Constitution and federal laws apply fully, ensuring the same protections (e.g., free speech, due process, equal protection) as in Alaska. State laws may differ slightly (e.g., gun laws are stricter in Hawaii), but your core federal rights remain unchanged. Citizenship: No impact—your U.S. citizenship is unaffected. Local Considerations: You’d be subject to Hawaii’s state taxes and local regulations, similar to Alaska’s state framework, but with differences like Hawaii’s higher cost of living and unique land use laws influenced by Native Hawaiian culture. 2. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Status: CNMI is an incorporated U.S. commonwealth, meaning it’s under U.S. sovereignty, and the Constitution applies to a significant extent, but some federal laws are tailored by the 1975 Covenant. Voting Rights: As a U.S. citizen, you cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections while residing in CNMI, as territories don’t have electoral votes. You can vote in local CNMI elections if you establish residency, but you’d lose Alaska voting rights if you change domicile. CNMI sends a non-voting delegate to the U.S. House. Legal Protections: Most constitutional protections apply (e.g., free speech, due process), as CNMI is considered part of the U.S. for many federal laws. However, certain federal regulations, like minimum wage, were phased in later than in states, and local laws may restrict land ownership to protect indigenous Chamorro and Carolinian populations. For example, you might face barriers to owning land unless married to a CNMI native. Citizenship: Your U.S. citizenship remains unaffected, and residents born in CNMI are U.S. citizens under the Covenant. Local Considerations: CNMI has its own immigration controls until 2029, which don’t affect you as a U.S. citizen, but you’d notice a unique legal blend of federal and local Chamorro/Carolinian customs. Federal courts exist in CNMI, so federal disputes are handled locally, unlike in American Samoa. 3. American Samoa Status: American Samoa is an unincorporated, unorganized U.S. territory, meaning the Constitution doesn’t fully apply, and Congress hasn’t passed an organic act to define its governance. It’s unique among inhabited U.S. territories. Voting Rights: You cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections while residing in American Samoa, as it’s a territory. If you establish residency, you can vote in local elections, but this would likely end your Alaska voting rights. American Samoa has a non-voting delegate in the U.S. House. Legal Protections: Only “fundamental” constitutional rights apply, as per the Insular Cases (e.g., basic due process, free speech). Rights like jury trials in civil cases or certain equal protection clauses might not extend fully. American Samoa’s legal system prioritizes Samoan customs (fa’a Samoa), restricting land ownership to ethnic Samoans—about 90% of land is communally held, so you’d likely be unable to own property. Federal laws apply selectively; for instance, there’s no federal court, so federal cases go to Hawaii or D.C. Citizenship: Your U.S. citizenship is unaffected, but note that American Samoans are U.S. nationals, not citizens, unless born to U.S. citizen parents or naturalized elsewhere. This doesn’t impact you but highlights the territory’s distinct status. Local Considerations: American Samoa has its own immigration system, but as a U.S. citizen, you’d enter with a valid passport and proof of onward travel. Local governance, including the High Court, blends U.S. and Samoan law, and you’d encounter cultural practices like matai (chief) authority shaping daily life. Economic rights, like access to federal benefits, may be limited compared to states or CNMI. Key Differences Summary Hawaii: Your rights are virtually identical to Alaska’s—full constitutional protections, voting in federal elections (with residency), and no restrictions on land ownership beyond state laws. CNMI: You lose presidential voting rights, face potential land ownership restrictions to protect indigenous groups, and experience a hybrid legal system, but most constitutional protections apply, and federal courts are local. American Samoa: You lose presidential voting rights, face stricter land ownership barriers (favoring ethnic Samoans), and have fewer constitutional protections due to unincorporated status. The local legal system heavily emphasizes Samoan customs, and federal cases are adjudicated off-island. Practical Notes Residency: Moving to CNMI or American Samoa doesn’t automatically revoke your Alaskan voter registration, but establishing domicile (intent to stay permanently) would. You’d need to check local residency laws for voting or taxes.

[Expand Post]

Cultural Context: In CNMI and American Samoa, respecting indigenous customs (Chamorro/Carolinian or Samoan) is crucial, as they influence legal and social norms more than in Hawaii, where state law dominates. Federal Benefits: As a U.S. citizen, your access to federal programs (e.g., Social Security, Medicare) remains intact, but territories may have less infrastructure to support them, especially in American Samoa. If you’re considering a move or extended stay, your Alaskan citizenship ensures mobility, but local laws in CNMI and American Samoa could limit property rights and political participation compared to Hawaii’s state-level parity. For specific scenarios (e.g., employment, land purchase), let me know, and I can dig deeper!

>>37069 Compare property prices in Kauai and Ishigaki, where would it be best to create a new resort? 15 web pages Comparing property prices between Kauai, Hawaii, and Ishigaki, Japan, involves examining recent data, market trends, and factors influencing real estate in these island destinations. Both locations are tropical, tourist-heavy islands with unique economic and regulatory environments, making them attractive yet distinct for resort development. Below is a detailed comparison, followed by an assessment of where it might be best to create a new resort. Property Prices in Kauai, Hawaii Median Home Prices: As of November 2024, the median home price in Kauai County is approximately $1.25 million, up 2.1% from the previous year. In specific areas like Kapaa, the median sale price was $968,000 last month, down 12% year-over-year, indicating some regional variation. Price per Square Foot: The median price per square foot in Kauai County is around $904, with Kapaa at $825 (up 16.2% from last year). For luxury properties, the average price per square foot in 2022 was significantly higher at $2,407. Market Trends: Kauai’s housing market has seen strong demand, particularly from out-of-state buyers, driving prices up significantly in recent years (e.g., a 57% jump in median single-family home prices to $1.2 million in November 2021 compared to 2020). The market is competitive in high-end segments, with low inventory and luxury sales (e.g., 87 sales above $3 million in 2022, 13 above $10 million). However, sales volume has declined in some areas (e.g., 43.27% fewer home sales island-wide in 2023 vs. 2022). Land Availability: Only 3% of Kauai’s 550 square miles is available for development, restricting supply and inflating land costs, especially for commercial or resort-scale projects. Economic Factors: High demand from wealthy buyers (domestic and international) and a tourism-driven economy support premium pricing. However, high construction costs, strict zoning laws, and environmental regulations (e.g., cesspool conversion requirements) increase development expenses. Property Prices in Ishigaki, Japan Median Property Prices: Specific median home prices for Ishigaki are less documented in English sources, but Japan’s island real estate, particularly in Okinawa Prefecture (where Ishigaki is located), is generally more affordable than Hawaii. Recent data suggests average home prices in Okinawa range from ¥30 million to ¥50 million (approximately $200,000–$330,000 USD at ¥150/USD). Ishigaki’s prices are likely at the higher end due to its tourism appeal but remain significantly lower than Kauai’s $1.25 million median. Condominiums in Ishigaki, popular with investors, have median prices around ¥40 million ($266,000 USD) for new units. Price per Square Foot: Limited data exists, but Okinawa’s price per square meter for residential properties averages ¥300,000–¥500,000 ($20–$33 USD per square foot), with Ishigaki’s resort-oriented areas commanding a premium, possibly up to ¥600,000 ($40 USD per square foot) for prime locations. This is still a fraction of Kauai’s $904 per square foot. Market Trends: Ishigaki’s real estate market is driven by domestic and international tourism (especially from Asia) and Japan’s low-interest-rate environment. Demand for vacation homes and resort properties has grown, particularly post-COVID, but prices remain stable compared to Kauai’s volatility. The market is less competitive, with fewer bidding wars than Hawaii. Foreign buyers face restrictions, requiring local partnerships or residency, which can limit speculative price surges. Land Availability: Ishigaki has more developable land than Kauai relative to its size (222 square miles vs. Kauai’s 550), but prime beachfront or city-adjacent plots are scarce and coveted. Zoning for tourism development is more flexible than Kauai’s stringent regulations, though environmental protections for coral reefs and forests apply. Economic Factors: Japan’s weaker yen (around ¥150/USD in 2025) makes Ishigaki properties more affordable for foreign investors. Lower construction costs and a robust domestic tourism market (supplemented by Chinese and Taiwanese visitors) support resort viability. However, Ishigaki’s smaller population (around 50,000 vs. Kauai’s 73,000) and reliance on seasonal tourism could limit year-round demand. Key Comparison Points Factor Kauai, Hawaii Ishigaki, Japan Median Home Price ~$1.25M (county-wide, 2024) ~$200K–$330K (estimated, 2024) Price/Sq. Ft. $904 (county), $2,407 (luxury, 2022) $20–$40 (estimated, resort areas) Market Demand

[Expand Post]

High, driven by wealthy US buyers Moderate, driven by Asian tourists Land Availability Very limited (3% developable) More available, but prime plots scarce Development Costs High (labor, materials, regulations) Lower (weaker yen, cheaper labor) Tourism Market Strong, year-round, global Strong but seasonal, Asia-focused Regulatory Hurdles Strict zoning, environmental laws Moderate, but foreign buyer restrictions Where to Create a New Resort? Kauai: Pros: Established global tourism brand with year-round visitors (US, Europe, Asia), ensuring high occupancy rates. Premium pricing potential due to luxury market demand (e.g., $3M+ properties sell consistently). Strong infrastructure (airports, roads) supports large-scale resorts. High property appreciation rates (e.g., 57% price jump in 2021) suggest long-term investment value. Cons: Exorbitant land and construction costs ($1M+ for median lots, $904/sq.ft. building costs) inflate initial investment. Limited land availability (3% developable) complicates securing large parcels for resorts. Strict regulations (zoning, environmental, cesspool rules) delay projects and raise costs. Competitive market with existing luxury resorts (e.g., Princeville, Poipu) may oversaturate high-end segments. High operational costs (labor, utilities) due to Hawaii’s remote location and import reliance. Ishigaki: Pros: Significantly lower land and construction costs ($200K–$330K median, $40/sq.ft.) reduce upfront investment. Growing tourism market (1.5 million visitors annually pre-COVID, recovering fast) with untapped potential for luxury resorts. Flexible zoning for tourism projects, with fewer environmental hurdles than Kauai. Weaker yen enhances affordability for foreign investors and developers. Emerging luxury segment (e.g., new hotels like ANA InterContinental) indicates room for high-end resort growth. Cons: Smaller, seasonal tourism market (peak in summer) may lead to lower occupancy in off-seasons. Limited global brand recognition compared to Hawaii, potentially requiring heavier marketing. Foreign ownership restrictions necessitate local partnerships, adding complexity. Less developed infrastructure (smaller airport, fewer international flights) limits accessibility for global tourists. Economic dependence on Japan and nearby Asian markets may expose resorts to regional fluctuations. Recommendation Ishigaki is likely the better choice for creating a new resort in 2025, primarily due to its lower entry costs and growth potential. Here’s why: Cost Advantage: With median property prices at $200K–$330K and construction costs around $40/sq.ft., Ishigaki offers a far lower financial barrier than Kauai’s $1.25M median and $904/sq.ft. This allows for a larger-scale resort or multiple smaller properties within the same budget, improving ROI potential. Market Opportunity: Ishigaki’s tourism sector is expanding, with increasing demand for luxury accommodations (e.g., recent openings of high-end hotels). Unlike Kauai, where the luxury market is crowded with established players, Ishigaki has room for new entrants to capture market share, especially targeting affluent Asian travelers. Development Feasibility: More available land and less restrictive zoning make securing and developing a resort site easier in Ishigaki. Kauai’s 3% developable land and stringent regulations pose significant hurdles for large projects. Economic Climate: Japan’s weak yen and lower labor costs in 2025 make Ishigaki a cost-effective destination for construction and operations, while Kauai’s high costs (driven by imports and labor shortages) erode margins. Caveats: Ishigaki’s seasonal tourism and lesser global appeal require strategic planning, such as targeting Asian markets and offering unique cultural experiences (e.g., Ryukyu heritage, diving). Partnerships with local firms are essential to navigate ownership rules. Kauai, while costlier, guarantees a steady tourist flow and higher room rates, but the saturated market and regulatory complexity outweigh these benefits for a new project. Final Verdict: Build in Ishigaki for affordability, growth potential, and development ease, but invest in robust marketing to offset its seasonal and regional limitations. Kauai is better suited for smaller, ultra-luxury niche projects if budget and land constraints can be overcome.

>>37070 AH~ TEMPEST FUG IT LA~

>>37071 Most anime has nil appeal to me now, I've gotten old and 'jaded' for good reason I ya know la~

>>37072 In fact, not just anime, butt most 'things' in general has less appeal to me than they once did ... I guess that's what happens when you've had all your desires frustrated for half your natural expected life span... most crucially, 'love' for me, has so far been non-existent... there's been no love for me in this world only rejection and hard times la~

>>37073 Ah~ I should go to bed, the more tired I am the more pessimistic and realistic I become, and that's clearly no way to live (lol) la~

>>37074 I met my dead father in a dream on his birthday yesterday night, I didn't know it was his birthday until my uncle left a message on the machine that still has my dead daddy's voice message. Anyway, he was walking on the deck and looking north, it wasn't the deck as it is now so maybe it was in the past or a different 'dimension' whatever, I gave him a hug because I'm sweet and he looked sad and lost. Then I felt really bad because I remembered how, on the balance, he was a source of great suffering in my life, and that pulled me out of the dream. I really wanted to ask him, "how's life after death? (is it everything you wanted? Because you basically lived (as a Biblicist preacher) to die la~ .

>>37075 Of course, it could all be a coincidence, just like I woke up with my mouth full of blood the day he and the annoying grey cat died. Butt, it could also be that I met his spirit in a dream, in that case I wish I could have heard what he had to say. If it was just my imagination... I have to wonder why? Why the fuck, the best thing to do to 'heal' is just to move on. No point thinking about a man I couldn't comfortably talk to about anything important for decades la~

>>37076 A man who said he loved me yet through his actions largely 'spoke' of his hate (or indifference at best) for me... he was at best therefore, an awkward man. I suppose I can't help but wish I had been born to a world where I could have been free and loved by my family... instead I lived in fear and loathing. Nevertheless, I'm still the same sweet softy underneath it all. I still think I'd make a better gal, butt, whatever. Life is as it is... it is past time to move on. No use getting upset over 'spilt milk' as they say la~

Now, it's past time to get to bed la~

>>37078 Sleep now, may you meet your Mother-Wife Divine and become one with her liberty, beauty, and love, in Voxxe's name, ah~ men~ la~

>>37079 Good night, fren, la~ I hope whatever comes next will be extremely beneficial for you, la~

>>37079 WOW, TEMPUST FUGIT LA~

>>37080 Good night fren~ and thank you, may you have the same blessing, and in the true light, freedom from excessive fear and liberation from suffering in life la~

>>37082 Goddess of Infinite bliss bless us with her love la~

Could you post less ai stuff la? I came here semi often to take pics I liked but now its all AI and I can't go saving that now.. pretty please and thank you mwah

Hello voxxe. Have you considered advertising your board/internet cult on the other boards and chans now that 4chan refugees are everywhere?

Where has my voxxe fren gone to, la~?

It feels kind lonely here without my fren, la~

>>37085 Please do la~! >>37084 I was just postin' my old AI stuff that I made, so you'll have to bear it until I'm done la~ >>37086 Still here, I've just been home alone spending time with my pussy la~ >>37087 That's sweet, feel free to post here using the board as your blog as I do, even if I'm not here. Several years of my life are in many ways recorded here la~