Something that I hate so much is seeing an artist talk about drawing a character I like or in this case getting permission to draw someone OC that I love for them to never do it. Why mention it if you are not going to do it, it just pisses me off. I could have gone without knowing there was a chance of some vore of a character I've been waiting for for so long, but now I know about it I'm pissed to know it never happened.

been trying to find a comic where 2 foxes enter a party of rabbits from few months ago does anyone know the one im talking about

>>69048 >>69064

A few question I want to ask people. If you were shrunk down, what would you try to do with your life? How screwd would you be if you were shrunken to about 6cm, and would anything improve your odds? If Vore was suddenly to become possible right now, and it was a one-way trip for the prey, would you actually try to eat or be eaten by someone? Also, if not, would you ever consider it in the future? In a world where vore is possible, would it change how you feel about vore? Also, how do you think it would affect places like Eka and people who make vore art and stories? Finally, how many people do you think would actually be willing to be eaten if given the chance, and how many of them do you think would regret it after digestion kicks in?

>>69209 I am well-adjusted in life, but vore has always been very appealing to me. In most cases I would not want to be eaten for real, given it's a one-way trip and I would lose a lot of pleasures in life. But there have been and are exceptions: - a girl I knew at college - two pregnant women I used to work with - a girl I saw some years ago at a concert - a woman I work with now If I found myself 6" tall and they were hungry, I would not run or hide and I am pretty sure I would become a willing resident of their stomach and a turd coming our of their butts when the're done digesting me.

Today I spent the afternoon with a chick I've been dating for a while. I put my head on her stomach when we were talking, and I could hear the gurgling noises inside from the food that was being digested when passing through her guts. She also told me what the had yesterday, so I know what was inside. Then we were having sex, she sat on my face, and while I was eating her pussy I had a prime view of her anus. I could not get out of my head the idea that that's where she shits from, and instead of being grossed out it turned me on, because I associate it with eating and digestion. Like I would love to make my way through her guts and out of her asshole. Does anyone have similar 'intrusive' thoughts related to vore when you are having sex?

Why have there been so many adoptables lately? I will say that the rabbit one is hot.

For any artist out there who sees this, there needs to be more proper insect, reptilian and monster-girl art. Stuff like what Sparrowl makes or like that one comic called Mosquito Season by Vanripper. These type of girls would be amazing to see in vore as they are much more interesting than most designs I have seen drawn on Eka. A lot of the monster girl art in Vore is the equivalent of a girl in cosplay with one key feature like giving them an insect abdomen. Lamias are the worst since they just slap a tail on them and call it a day. I would say the only expectation is slime girls since they are what they are, but I've seen some that are just basically girls with no interesting gimmicks or designs for a slime. I do like some very human monster girls like Rim from The Dungeon of Black Company, but I just think it would be nice to see more interesting designs. Also in my opinion, why make them a monster girl if you're skimping on the monster part? So please if any artist sees this and wants to draw monster girls, then use artists like Sparrowl as inspiration and make the features more prominent without taking away from the charm. Sparrowl has proven you can do this and still make cute/hot girls, and I think it will make your art stand out more and help with creative thinking. Mosquito Season by Vanripper https://mega.nz/folder/R5VExDZC#IUYZI517XK2TDFwxg06xiA/folder/Z8Nmnb6S Sparrowl https://x.com/isb9898?lang=en

>>70234 >Why have there been so many adoptables lately? Get a bunch of suckers to pay real money for run-of-the-mill concept characters that they will almost never use except as comissions that you will then do. That's my best guess.

anyone who can update Shura's patreon? https://kemono.su/patreon/user/19985317

I have a question about commissions. When they say "no drawing of other people's OCs without permission," does that mean any character made by an artist on Twitter, or is it more to do with vore artists? I'm asking as I've seen a character I would really like to see in vore, but she's an OC for a Twitter artist. So I was thinking of commissioning someone to draw her, but most artists tend to say no drawings of other people's OCs.

Has anyone thought of using SFM for vore? It seems much easier than MMD which I've seen used a lot and there are so many good models you can get working in SFM. I saw this animation earlier today and I was thinking of how nice it would be to see vore of the Nitori and Futo models with how cute and expressive they can be. would make for a great animation or even a few images would be cool. I know the bellies would probably not look the best but I think it still would be interesting to see. I may even look into doing it myself as long as there isn't any way for my friends to find out. Would not want them asking why I'm animating a character eating someone. https://x.com/i/status/1903742315442651496

>>71088 "Has anyone thought about using SFM for vore" Plenty of people do already. Blutheinkling, blueblaze95/seb111114--basically all the 3d MLP vore animators actually--MD0002, there's plenty. If anything SFM has more vore-ready models. MMD is popular for...some reason, I really don't know why.

>>71110 I've always found MMDs to be clunky and outdated so I also find it odd that so many people use it for animations. I also find that 90% of vore animations with MMD are very lazy, being the bare minimum needed to convey vore. Even if someone can get their head around MMDs I feel SFM is just a better choice with plenty of potential. Comparing the two SFM animations are always much better even on the low end they have so much more going on and at the high end SFM are amazing. I would say Blender is a good choice but as someone who uses Blender, even if it's mainly for modelling, I've found animation with it finicky if you don't have a high-quality rig. I may be wrong, but SFM just seems to have much better support overall and the quality is great once you get used to it. Would talk about Maya if it didn't cost an arm and a leg.

>>71115 Blender is way more powerful if you know what you're doing and have some problem solving skills.There are some real wizards out there that could do Same Sized vore in so inclined and one example I remember from the smutbase discord is some dude had a physics based stomach deformer that accommodated a cock bigger than the character's body.

Futa means females with dicks rught? If so, why do people tag Futa with Female pred when you can use Futa pred? If you're looking for Futa art, then you're going to look for futa pred. Then, everyone who doesn't like futa can put female pred and not get blasted with futa art. I know you can blacklist but that dosn't account for art with both a futa and female pred.

>>72759 >Futa means females with dicks rught? Not quite A "futa"/"herm" is a girl with a dick in addition to her having a vag and tits. However if the person just has tits and a dick but no vag, then it's a "shemale". However both terms fall under the much larger category of being a "dickgirl". >If so, why do people tag Futa with Female pred when you can use Futa pred? It's because members of the tranny cult have deemed the terms "futa(nari)", "herm(aphrodite)" (Which is a literal scientific term), "shemale", and "trap" to be heretical terms (Not "ladyboy" or "cuntboy" though, for whatever reason), and have therefore demanded that they "must" all be purged in usage and reclassified as "transgender" or the more generic term of "intersex". However there has been more radical members of said cult who think such changes "are not enough", and have therefore demanded that places make even more radical readjustments in how they determine sex-based categories. For example, e621 made the radical change years ago of switching out the already established terms and tags that you see above and listed for "andromorph" and "gynomorph", which caused a bunch of people who were fed up with the change to start up their own furfag booru (This link can only be accessed using Tor, for those unaware): http://owmvhpxyisu6fgd7r2fcswgavs7jly4znldaey33utadwmgbbp4pysad.onion/ Although in the particular situation you're talking about, it sounds like you're talking about the cult members who unironically believe that disliking trannies or anything "intersex" (Despite the fact that "intersex" has absoultely NOTHING to do with being "trans" as being "trans" is a political/religious term) means that's you're a sexist biggot because "trans-(wo)men are 'real' (wo)men". And therefore you're not "really" straight or "really" gay, what you are is "super straight" or "super gay". And if you're "super straight" or "super gay" according to these cultists, then you're a racist sexist homophobic transphobic xenophobic incel pissbaby Nazi who deserves to be endlessly ridiculed and scorned for the rest of your days and even after your death. Because you're NOT being a "good cis-ally" or a "gay person who wants to be a gay voice".

everyone shut the fuck up! i fucking had it with this bullshit, why the fuck are you still fighting over this fucking shit!? every fucking where i go is the same fucking shit, why are all of you so fucking stupid!? all of you are fucking morons! that's right every single one of you! i fucking hate trannies, they're a fucking parasite, they ruin everything they touch but guess fucking what? you anti-trannies are equally as obnoxious! i never in my life have seen such terrible takes, is every single one of you literally retarded!? troons are just narcissitic liars that want to get their ego stroked by people they can easily manipulate, and if they fail to manipulate they throw tantrums, that's fucking it they're everywhere because that's what narcissists do, that's why we're against them it's such a simple thing, so fucking simple even an infant would know, but no! you still fuck it up by asking retarded things like "what does it mean to be a man/woman" or question unrelated things like futanari, that's not the point you fucking retard!!!! you're missing the forest for the trees!!! or maybe is it because you actually love trannies and are in denial!? you faggots

>>72774 So based. Trannies make vore fetishists look mentally stable but obsessing over every retard tranny's actions and then arguing with tranny lovers on 8chan forums is almost as equally as pathetic

>>72774 >troons are just narcissitic liars that want to get their ego stroked by people they can easily manipulate, and if they fail to manipulate they throw tantrums, that's fucking it No, it's not. It doesn't explain everything from why it is that "DQSH" is specifically a program that's aimed at kids (And no one else) to how they love-bomb people into becoming trans themselves. If it was just a case of "narcisism", then these people wouldn't have any power in the first place as no one likes to hang around narcissists. >they're everywhere because that's what narcissists do, that's why we're against them No, it's not. The Soviet Union had such a tactic referred to as "Top down, bottom up, inside out". What they would do is put their own people in positions of power who would put in effect (Or refuse to enforce alrerady existing) laws for the purposes of causing agitation, then they would have other members start up "grass roots" organizations who would make it look it's a mandate from the "people", and then they'd move on to dismantling or recontextualizing cultural establishments and norms by presenting themselves as being "normal people" or playing the sob-story about how they're being unjustly "excluded". This isn't anything new. And trying to treat it as something as mundane as someone wanting attention either shows that you have zero knowledge on what you're talking about, or showing that you're trying to protect yourself by using the excuse of Occam's razor ("of two competing theories, the simpler explanation of an entity is to be preferred) all the while ignoring that Occam's razor is about coming to a conclusion based on the simplest explanation possible that leaves the fewest question unanswered. How the Hell does "Narcisism" explain away government laws dedicated to kidnapping children from their parents if they use the wrong pronoun and the act of mutiliating and sterilizing entire swaths of the population? >it's such a simple thing It is a "simple" thing. It's referred to as a Cultural Revolution. You know, like the one West Taiwan went through back in the sixties with the Destruction Of The Four Olds. And it's a lot more similar than you think as even Chairman MaoMao was pushing his own form of transgenderism during that time as he even said: https://archive.ph/Hlupl <doff femininity and don military attire And... <To be taken seriously as a Red Guard and militant, one had to don a masculine appearance. With accounts from people who lived through that era testifying: https://archive.ph/OLk2G >According to the research of Emily Honig on the personal accounts of female Red Guards, one women recounted that anything that would “make girls look like girls was bourgeois. We covered up our bodies so completely that I almost forgot I was a girl.” This demonization of femininity and conflation of feminine space, jobs, and dress with the bourgeois meant that (urban) females could not openly and safely be feminine women during the Cultural Revolution, for fear of violence. I take it that none of this sounds familiar?

>>72807 >no one likes to hang around narcissists anon, most often than not you won't notice you're hanging with a narcissist because many of them know how to hide their most obvious flaws, you probably know many people that are actually narcissists but you still haven't noticed it yet. narcissists are people that are so addicted to get positive reinforcement that they'll do anything in their power to get it, even if it hurts other people or themselves, they often learn manipulation tactics in order to have power over people they also can't take any sort of negative comments towards them, they see anything that doesn't stroke their ego as the worst kind of insult, that's why they get so aggressive one of the most common things they do when they don't get what they want is try to ruin the life of anyone responsible until they do get what they want >How the Hell does "Narcisism" explain away government laws dedicated to kidnapping children from their parents if they use the wrong pronoun and the act of mutiliating and sterilizing entire swaths of the population? because there are narcissist people in power and they can't stand people not doing what they want, that's the main symptom of narcissim anon. don't you understand it anon? can't you see what all of those political figures you mentioned have in common? how do you think they got into power? how do you think they stayed in power? by being honest good understanding people? of course fucking not! they manipulated everyone they could in order to get what they want maybe you know a lot of politics, (which is cool btw), but you forgot about the most simple thing, the human side of things they aren't evil just to be evil, anon. they're evil because they just see it as a means to an end

>>72815 >you won't notice you're hanging with a narcissist because many of them know how to hide their most obvious flaws No, they don't. >narcissists are people that are so addicted to get positive reinforcement that they'll do anything in their power to get it, even if it hurts other people or themselves >they also can't take any sort of negative comments towards them, they see anything that doesn't stroke their ego as the worst kind of insult You just described people in general. Nothing in that statement is an activity that narcissists exclusively engage in. Absolutely everyone looks for attention in some way, shape, or form and don't care how they get it. And absolutely everyone loaths receiving ridicule. You're trying to attach a label to basic human behavior. >one of the most common things they do when they don't get what they want is try to ruin the life of anyone responsible until they do get what they want Getting revenge, or being a child, is now a "narcissistic" behavior? >and they can't stand people not doing what they want, that's the main symptom of narcissim anon Not necessarily. They could also be seeking to punish people for not doing what they want out of fear. Consider all the true believers in the climate scam who unironically believe that, unless we destroy all usage of fossil fuels, the world is going to end in the next decade. Those of us who actually do our research will find such a concept laughable, but these people really believe it and are living in fear every moment of every day. Or consider situations like team and character building in occupations like the military, where they do work and punish everyone literally to death because of one person daring to defy an order, either for the purposes of testing your limits or to change your mindset. >how do you think they got into power? In both the cases of Lenin, Hidler, and MaoMao, they took advantage of a destablized and demoralized country at the end of their ropes after being subject for years on end to a government that was corrupt as fuck and promised people that they would make the country stable again. >how do you think they stayed in power? Public displays of being an "everyman", talking about how great the country "could" be, keeping the people as busy as possible, power struggles with their rivals >they manipulated everyone they could in order to get what they want Doesn't everyone? There's nothing inherently wrong with manipulation and exploitation. The store "manipulates" you to give up your money by offering products that you may desire, and you can "manipulate" the store by refusing to shop there until they do something that you want (Be it lower prices or offer a different product). That's the way the world works, the basic economic principles of "supply & demand". The only thing you can really point to as being wrong is HOW the manipulation occurs. >they're evil because they just see it as a means to an end Again, DOESN'T EVERYONE?! Home Depot doesn't give two shits what you're using their home improvement products for (From replacing a light to building a gun to assassinate the Japanese PM), all they care about is getting your money. >they aren't evil just to be evil Are they "evil"? What specifically makes them "evil"? All you've done throughout this entire conversation is try to paint basic human behavior as being an indication that someone is inherently a "bad person".

Did this thread just go from a question about futa vore tagging to troons to historical dictators What the shit

Why can’t the Voraisha thread be this fun?

>>72819 >No, they don't. don't be so sure anon, that's how they get you >You just described people in general maybe i did, but the thing that differenciates narcissists from normal people is that normal people can choose to not let those emotions get a hold of them >getting revenge, or being a child is now "narcissistic" behaviour? yes, it is. people are born with narcissistic traits, but they normally lose them when growing up, narcissists are people who never grew out of them >They could also be seeking to punish people for not doing what they want out of fear. out of fear of the possibility of people not doing what they want >They took advantage of a destablized and demoralized country you just said it anon, they took advantage of a vulnerable nation by manipulating them with lies in order to get what they want >common narcissistic acts exactly! >Doesn't everyone? no, anon. not everyone does that, even less consciously. your example with economics fails to take into consideration the fact that many of the people in power fake the prices by manipulating the supply (artificial scarcity) and the demand >Again, DOESN'T EVERYONE?! again... NO, THAT'S NOT NORMAL BEHAVIOUR AT ALL!!! people in theory should feel sympathy and/or compassion for other people. also, home depot (and brands, corporations, etc.) aren't people, they're a messy sludge of bureocracy and bad decitions made for the only purpose of making the owner richer (guess how the owner got to where he is) >What specifically makes them "evil"? the fact that they're willing to throw everyone under the bus for just a drop of ego stroking btw, narcissism isn't just an attention seeking disorder, it's selfishness taken up to 100

>>72826 >but the thing that differenciates narcissists from normal people is that normal people can choose to not let those emotions get a hold of them So can narcissists because the behaviors you're describing are not exclusive to them. >people are born with narcissistic traits, but they normally lose them when growing up No, they don't. Wisdom does not come with age. >out of fear of the possibility of people not doing what they want How did you read that ENTIRE paragraph and have that be your sole takeaway? >they took advantage of a vulnerable nation by manipulating them So did Trump, twice. And Obama. And Reagan. And FDR. And numerous other leaders. You're so deadset on trying to prove your point that your destroying any argument that you had. Do you want to know what the actual medical definition of "narcissism is? Here you go: <the state or stage of development in which there is considerable erotic interest in one's own body and ego and which in abnormal forms persists through fixation or reappears through regression ((C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights reserved) >not everyone does that, even less consciously Yes, they do. >people in power fake the prices by manipulating the supply No, they don't, at least in not in the way you're implying. In fact, if you want an example of ACTUAL price manipulation, you should look at the price of things like silver. It's a industrial metal used in everything from medical equipment to weapons to every single electronic device in your home. Given that it's such as important metal to the modern world, you'd think it would see a similar rise in price as gold has, but it has actually managed to somehow "remain" well below that price at less than $40 spot. And the reason that's happening is because of groups are "flooding" the market, on paper, with the claim that there is more silver than there is actually in demand. And so the price will not go up (Until it finally does), and it's much more profitable to despose of silver in a landful than recycle it for something else. It's a similar thing with why West Taiwan is such an industrial powerhouse right now. They kept the prices of their labor artificially low, much lower than is realistically possible, and it priced out the competition. And in some ways, that only further reinforces the point about how supply and demand effect economics. >people in theory should feel sympathy and/or compassion for other people Why? Everyone is too busy having their own problems that they have to deal with. Why should they waste their own time trying to solve other people's problems when they cannot solve their own? Sure, you can make the argument that it makes circumstances "Better" for eveyone if you do, but who are you to say what's "better" if your own life is a mess? There's a reason why the directions on life vests and oxygen masks detail that you take care of yourself first BEFORE you start helping other people. And even then, haven't you ever noticed that the people actually giving other people what they want are the reasons why certain people are swimming in money and others are not? I hate Jeff Bezos as much as the next guy, but I cannot deny the fact that the guy is only successful and has as much money as he does because he's giving people what they want or what they need with products and services like a near unlimited store and next-day shipping. And it's one of the aspects of free markets and capitalism that people cannot understand no matter how much it's explained to them. That greed IS good because, in order BE greedy, I have to care about making something that other people want or need. >home depot (and brands, corporations, etc.) aren't people Yes, they are. These brands and companies didn't just appear out of thin air. >the fact that they're willing to throw everyone under the bus for just a drop of ego stroking Some would argue that being a stepping-stone towards allowing a peer to succeed is actually a noble idea. Or that it doesn't matter if someone is getting the "proper" accreditation so long as the policy or plan is being implemented. And again, you're ridiculing basic human behavior. Just look at the passage of where Christ healed the ten leapers, where only ONE of them returned and offered his thanks. >it's selfishness taken up to 100 Thus far, you haven't actually expressed what that is in action. You're just describing basic human behavior.

>>72819 Anon you are in for a big surprise (if you ever get married of course) if you think some narcissists can't hide their narcissism. I can't tell whether everyone in this thread is socially inept since we're generalizing all narcissists in such broad strokes as if some narcissists aren't smarter than others.

what the actual shitting fuck is happening with the other site

>>72891 What "other site"?

>>72891 >>72892 Never mind, see: >>>/v/1089304 Or: https://zzzchan.xyz/v/thread/273222.html#273552

There was this model, Wink, on v*orewhores, who left the site to do her own thing, does anyone know where her new website is?

>>72902 Deserved. The /v/ here is so much better anyway with poster ID killing 80 IQ, broken record samefags. I ain't going back and if the other site does return I'm dumping vore of vidya waifus and you should too.

>>72902 >>73300 Speaking of which, how's everyone else been doing with the recent influx?

>>73328 I'm not a mod so I don't know the stats, but to me, it doesn't really feel like this specific board has gotten any more traffic from the 4chan downtime Probably because 4chan has no vore board and the boards with dedicated vore threads didn't have that many people posting on them