>>1600 Just made an account, notorioustg. Send me vol when you can.

>>1603 Done, and thank you notorious.

>>1605 Thanks a bunch. Now it's time to show bumpfag the door.

>>1607 Good hunting

Is there an altchan for 4/qst/ that I can look into or would it have to be remade?

>>1613 extant, but currently kinda dead https://8chan.moe/quests/ so, depends what you mean by remade. The board exists, but the community will have to be remade from scratch up to and including acquiring a new admin. And since I don't see anything about boards becoming claimable after prolonged admin inactivity on 8chan like I do on 8kun, I think you'd probably have to either successfully contact the original admin who was wanting to pass off 5 entire years ago, or contact 8chan staff to get them to pass it to you.

>>1618 Is there any reason why we couldn't host quests here? If we get enough /qst/ activity to justify a new board, they can split off.

>>1613 >>>/nutg/

>>1618 Yeah anyone can claim an abandoned board, just ask Codexx on >>>/site/ or send an email, and its called BO or Board Owner, the admin rank is for the head of the global moderation team, or king janny. You can also email the site yeah. >>1620 No reason at all, go for it!

>>1546 >The upsides always outweigh the downsides when it comes to ids. Wrong. Anonymity is central to the shedding of ego. >>1567 >I say no because muh boogiemen hurt mah feefees and I should hold them accountable forever waah waah Retard.

>>1623 >>I say no because muh boogiemen hurt mah feefees and I should hold them accountable forever waah waah >Retard. Lol okay faggot, enjoy your empty board.

>>1306 I'm currently deciding between chans to move to, and chan.moe's /tg/ and Ourchan's /x/ seems the most inviting so far.

>>1573 >>1585 Like anon here said, there was an anon (or a couple of them) who spammed the board with retarded garbage threads and/or concent farms accompanied by even trashier aislop examples: >Would an elf with a ribbon on her head be slower in combat? >Do mages in your setting wear a cape? I don't know if it's him too, but I would also see threads pop up like >What color of socks do gnomes wear in your settings? >Do orcs have pimples Other times, he would team up with a janny and they would make bait threads that go like >Hello, I am a transgender person with a lot of melanin and it feels wrong to play an orc. How should I do this? and then the janny would come and ban every rational reply to such questions. This anon (or anons) is very easy to spot because all of his threads share the same charateristics >open questions that never mention specific systems or worldbuilding that would justify a mechanic >D&D 5e is implied (but also never mentioned) >never replies to anons engaging in conversation >never gives his own example/setting where the concern question originated from >>1623 <now here is where IDs are important >would talk to himself with equally retarded answers that don't really give an answer to the question to bump the threads

>>1628 So many fucking years of asinine threads like this that never died because he would bump them to bump limit. But yeah, we can finally do something about it. No more of this fucking shit.

>>1629 Jesus...that shit lasted for YEARS?! No wonder 4/tg/ was dead then I returned. I actually spent more time here back in 2015-2016 and had only recently (for the past 6-7 months) started visiting 4/tg/ to get some interesting ideas to run my campaign and was shocked to see the board shat up to uselessness. Jannies didn't help either. I would get banned for even the most milktoast shitpost and would delete the posts so you can't even tell what other anons who also got bannned did wrong. I genuinely had more productive /tg/ related stuff on /pol/ (I'm the elf drawfag) which told of the state of 4/tg/. Anyhow I hope 4cuck stays dead so we can be proper fa/tg/uys

>>1630 >Anyhow I hope 4cuck stays dead so we can be proper fa/tg/uys Same. Even if there are only a dozen people here, I'd rather talk to them than the hordes who overran /tg/ years ago. Anyway, do we have a board mascot or anything?

>>1631 I remember pimp lich >>1145 being the dude most representing the board but I haven't been here in years so I don't know if anything changed

>>1632 I like Pimp Lich. We should re-elect him.

>>1633 I think I'll sit down and draw Pimp Lich today or tomorrow. Some art I see here is more than 10 years old.. Should I post the Pimp Lich here or in drawthread to revive it a bit?

>>1634 Draw thread imo. Cool to have a resident drawfag around.

>>1628 IDs doesn't help with that, because 1) It was fedposting. 2) They constantly changed IP. It was a moderation issue, not an ID issue, and Jewmod was in on it.

>>1641 >They constantly changed IP Irrelevant since the ip counter was removed >It was a moderation issue, not an ID issue, and Jewmod was in on it. Fair, still i think that for the transition the IDs are useful, the BO can still experiment as we go.

>>1630 I haven't really checked into /tg/ in ages. Board felt utterly dead, over moderated, like there were both users reporting everything they just didn't like seeing and a mod actually banning and deleting everything that got reported, and then 9/10ths of the threads have just been advertising instead of actual discussion, all general this and general that, no more seat of the pants posting about something because you feel like it. Generals really do bring out the worst

>>1644 >Irrelevant since the ip counter was removed That was on deadchan, not here, so yeah, exceptionally relevant. There's nothing wrong with counters.

>>1646 I still have the old mentality of generals being a way to contain discussion on a topic from disrupting the rest of the board. Should that way of thinking be left behind? Would it be acceptable to just make a thread about Warhammer Fantasy if that's what I want to talk about?

>>1673 Personally i think generals are fine for niche/old stuff, they focus the attention in one specific place when otherwise, as separate threads, they would wither shortly (or became de facto generals, by thread derails, for that specific subject).

>>1673 imo both approaches are fine. Generals for very specific autism and open threads for lighter topics/shooting the shit.

Hey notorious you accidentally banned the original BO of /tg/. I lifted it but please try and be more careful buddy, anyways hope everyone is having a good day.

>>1693 >you accidentally banned the original BO of /tg/ >accidentally banned >accidentally Bros... I have bad feeling

>>1696 >>1693 >accidentally

>>1696 >>1706 You're telling me the original BO is the one bumping a dead elf thread with AI slop? This is the other post I issued a range ban for.

>>1758 that would be so fucking funny and explain so goddamn much

>>1758 I mean I guess apparently idk, hes an old friend and a founding member of the 8moe /tg/ rpg group, which he may or may not still run, idk I didn't ask. Busy sadly. Anyways he's still a volunteer here as well, hes named Mortarion.

>>1758 No that wasn't me. I would never in my life post AI slop. That being said I think you went too far banning the guy. I have no idea which post it was that got me banned, The only reason I was given was "bumpfagging". Whatever the hell that means.

>>1809 >bumpfagging nta, but see >>1628 for more details. While I hate power-tripping mods that ban left and right, bumpfag also appeared in wh40k thread and once ban was announced, the retard question subsided, so I think it was good call.

>>1809 I found the post that got me banned.