>>27002
if it's the x-ray you're talking about, daram usually does x-ray variants so it got baked in. still surprised how well baked it got in considering this is an "undercooked" model
https://files.catbox.moe/bmzpwk.png
there's an undercooked nababa lora I was using at .4 strength and I think I fucked up the settings for it since it's 400mb. I can litterbox that if you want
>>27004
general negative I'm running is
>multiple views, sound effects, lowres, (bad), ( dark_skin, dark-skinned_male, sagging_breasts, pubic hair ) text, error, fewer, extra, missing, worst quality, jpeg artifacts, low quality, watermark, unfinished, displeasing, oldest, early, chromatic aberration, signature, extra digits, artistic error, username, scan, white_pupils, monochrome, limited_palette, greyscale, blurry, blurry_foreground, motion_blur, censored, bar_censor,
also, sampler: euler cfgpp, 1.7 cfg, sgm uniform. I feel like sampler makes a bigger difference than negatives