>>64894
>You simply do not understand that without love, you cannot keep your position as someone strong
But you can. With it, however, you encourage eventual decay and weakness.
>Because strength is in numbers. And if you lose those numbers, you will not be strong.
One does not require "love" to maintain numbers. It can be used, but it's not necessary.
>You think strength is personal, but strength is simply success. And those without support to achieve their goals are not strong. They are weak.
Everything you've said here
still doesn't change the fact that a group of men could stop at your house, violently murder you, get away with it, and die relatively content years later. All without "love".
>And so, Love and Justice always win.
Where and when?