>>218040
>That's not the point or argument being made at all though?
Actually, it is. The reason why I bring up cannibalism and rape as examples is that not every culture accepted these practices, even when untouched by other cultures. Homosexuality included. And, even then, the listing of two "protected" societies brings up a little issue because how many "protected" societies actually do practice this? How many "protected" societies are out there that do practice homosexuality and prove the theory that faggotry is "not learned", or not even participate in homosexuality at all. Have you ever considered the possibility that the authors singled out those two society because they fit his hypothesis and the agenda he was pushing?
And, it
DOES wrap back around to the fact that they're trying to push what is "normal". They're trying to establish the fact that a "protected" societies practices homosexuality, without issue, and state that it's proof that homosexuals molesting children have a net zero effect on the outcome of those molested children going on to become molesters themselves.