>>330184 Remember, Twitter has a limit on length. And they're worse than Youtube when it comes to making content a safe-space- or even shadow banning. Then again, if they put all the deploreables in a box, we just galvanize each other even more?

>>330212 Well, we can't be spreading stuff if there is nothing to spread. We have the script, now we need the video and the channel. Since nobody has offered to read the script, we should use subtitles with images and music and call it a day, and jump to the next topic.

>>330214 >Since nobody has offered to read the script, we should use subtitles with images and music and call it a day, and jump to the next topic. If it needs a voice so bad just use a text to speech program or something, imo using a real human bean voice is too much of a hassle for what this is. >use subtitles with images and music and call it a day, and jump to the next topic. Just go for it, gambatte and so forth.

Hey, guys, could we see about getting a list of topics to make videos on? The reason I ask is so that we can keep a continuous flow of content in production rather than waiting on everyone else to finish the video and then begin making the new one.

The script is too damn wordy, doesn't flow well, has grammar and spelling errors and contains lots of technical speak that just confuses normalfags. Also, I don't understand the relevance of the opening quote. It also needs to be more succinct. Drive home the fact that the media dishonestly used flawed research to create a narrative.

>>330219 Then, I'll see about cleaning it up tomorrow. It's a bit late for me to do it at the moment.

>>330217 Sure thing, everyone dig into your GG folder and find something we could push out there CON would make an interesting topic considering they're an official Twitter trusted safety resource and I'll see what else I can dig up Another option would be to go to Deepfreeze and see if we can find something We should focus more on recent events though instead of digging up stuff from 2015. Alternatively, take some of the older stuff and show why it's relevant today

Here is the revised script. Shaved off about a minute, and reworded a couple of things. Also, decided to call ourselves "Operation: Collaborative Downfall" (OP:CD) because "Operation: Follywood" just sounded too lame and tacky. If you guys object, I'm willing to hear suggestions.

What about a continuation of GG in 60 seconds but for years 2 and 3, filled with humor, being the boogeyman, quieter times regulated to traps are gay debates etc,and the fall of anti-gg pedos and rapists and being a reliable FTC resource. At the end, stress the importance of rebuilding the new sites, maybe mention their growth, and the people still in influence that need only slander once more to get their ads targeted. Humor is really important as well as being brief and concise.

>>330225 I appreciate the help m8. The script centers around that 2015 Miami study, but it doesn't clearly refute it. Instead, the main argument against it seems to be "but this more comprehensive German study says gamers aren't shit". Cherry picking evidence is a weak argument, and also an appeal to authority. I also question whether digging up shit from 2015 is productive. I'd prefer a more recent topic, or one that is universal - localisation/culturalization is a good fit, and ties in with the recent ESA digging as well. I also volunteer for voicing duties, but I'd like to see if we can come up with a better script.

>>330229 I was wondering same too, but I thought about considering that the first one would be more of a test video so that we know what we're dealing with and where we're going. As far as recent events, aside from the ESA, there is also "The National D.va Association" in Korea, which Blizzard appears to support: >>>/v/12003350 >>>/v/12003353 And, how some Western parties did start to talk about it: https://archive.fo/gZegd

>>>/v/12003662 >>>/v/12003665 >>>/v/12003721 Unfortunately, I've yet to find any Western sources talking about what is going on in Korea outside of imageboard users.

I revised the script. Interested in any feedback.

>>330232 Sounds good, but you come across as too aggressive in wanting to prove how biased the media is. We have to provide enough that the viewer can come to their own conclusions, and we cannot have it sounding like we're preaching to them. Also, we need to find a way to rephrase this: >Now here’s the thing: it was bullshit! Let's leave swearing out of it because that's the point normal folk begin to tune out.

Uh oh.

>>330239 I remember when reddit, twitter and 8ch were united in wanting to BTFO of these precious snowflakes.

>>330217 >>330222 Agreed on most points brought up. Might be worth repeating, but this is just a possible topic list so far. -CON leaks -DeepFreeze, looks to be getting some exposure and traction, this is good. Get it more well known. -preorder, day1 dlc, seasons pass that doesn't seem to make sense for the genre or game, basically questionable industry trends and practices that would be good for customers to consider before opening their wallet. Semi political stuff but I'd argue still qualifies due to media bullshit. -WSJ doing a smearjob on Pewd. -MSM doing a smearjob on Milo.

>>330246 Forgot to add. -FBI clearing GG.

Chucking this one out ripe for the edit. Basic gist, it's a scene from Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex recap episode. Buncha /pol/fags sitting around in a 3D representation of a chat room talking about terrorism or some shit. Enter Major Vivian Kusunagi who sits down and joins in on the conversation as they go over the evidence of the event so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poKi7YyuamI

>>330232 Just finished making some changes to the script. I'll clean it up tomorrow and post it there.

Alright, here's the revised script

This anon: >>>/v/12021174 ...suggested "Rapid Fire". Let's use that. Is everyone else alright with calling ourselves "Operation Rapid Fire"?

Despite my earlier advice, here's how not to do it IMO. He interrupts what's going on to snark and agree/disagree without expanding upon it (sort of like the Daily Show, but without twisting it to push an agenda, or relying on a specific timing to make it harder to form your own thoughts. More on that in the next post). He brings nothing to the table. His other work is fine- he either retorts (with evidence) or just lets the footage play out. IMO, films should come in one of several formats: - Clip: A clip taken that proves someone of wrong-doing or ill-character. No introduction, no VA over the top. Just the context and a link in the description to the source. - Clip + Retort/Meme: Same as above, only it finishes with presenting evidence that proves a person's statement wrong/right. Or, even just a joke mocking something in the clip. Never put something before the clip- even as a set up to a joke. Evidence in context is priority 1, and should be the first thing the viewer sees while they have full attention. - Theory & Evidence Declaration (TED): Using appropriate footage, a VA or subtitles present the case for a fact. Evidence is sourced both in the video, and in the description.

>>330273 Here's what I meant about the Daily Show. This applies to other liberal media as well. They try to be funny, and use that to create a bombardment of information to prevent their target audience (morons) from thinking and forming their own opinion. Plus, they laugh (at low-tier "isn't X like Y" jokes) so it makes them feel good. A pavolvian reaction to supporting X ideals and rejecting others. Ergo, we don't want to do the same. Resist the urge to snark- make meme videos their own thing and never the main content of the "channels". Inform, and give pause to let the audience form their own opinion based on what they just saw/heard.

>>330258 nice la. one possible edit > outside of alleged Right leaning news sites such as Forbes and Breitbart Snowflakes will trigger when they hit this sentence. They'll have an emotional response that will short-circuit the rational response "oh, you're one of those" and close the tab. There's no need pimp alternative news sources, they'll find these when they're ready to find them. I'd consider cutting that line, but I'm not sure what to replace it with. Maybae a comment that negative news "11 men were mean online" seems to be distributed wider than positive news "we can all successfully play together". Side note: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/11/26/how-trumps-campaign-used-the-new-data-industrial-complex-to-win-the-election/ https://motherboard.archive.pls/en_us/article/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win Does anyone have any insight on how to extend OCEAN to suit our purposes? How to create different messages for different key personalities types, emphasizing different topics. (this is likely worth it's own thread rather then derailing your topic)

>>330260 Rapid Fire is gud imo, don't get too bogged down too much on the name since the important thing is making the vid and making it good and getting it out. But Rapid Fire sounds good imo.

>>330247 The Evil Axis of the 8/v/ Illuminati, Russian hackers, the frog-posting Alt-Right, and God Emperor Trump got the GamerGate FBI investigation quashed in the face of all that evidence of harassment.

>>330276 I just changed that part of the sentence to: >Unfortunately, outside of the lesser known sites at the time that report on games and/or technology,… Does that sound better?

>>330283 I don't see anything wrong with it.

>>330322 Okay, how is the rest of production coming along? Also, I was think of writing something up on the "gamification" concept the ESA and "developers" keep pushing. How does that sound?

>>330325 >Okay, how is the rest of production coming along? Eh? >Also, I was think of writing something up on the "gamification" concept the ESA and "developers" keep pushing. How does that sound? Sounds good, I don't believe many are aware of what it is.

>>330326 >>Okay, how is the rest of production coming along? >Eh? I thought there were other people working on this project. There was a guy who said he could work on the video editing. Another person doing the art. Though, we haven't found anyone to throw in their voice yet.

>>330327 Ah. I came up with the Rapid Fire name.

Just finished the rough draft of the "Gamification" script. It runs on a bit long (It's a little over 4 pages), so we'll need to see about cutting the unneeded parts. Also, someone neededs to review some of the references and try to find better sources than the blog posts and AMA sites I used. Other than that, how does it look?

>>330331 Not bad, needs some buffing out on the writing, but your mesage is clear.

>>330331 Okay, never mind, cancelling this. >>>/v/12130500 >I don't see any reason to make a video about gamification, and honestly I don't think you have any particular understanding of it. What you produced is basically sub-Extra Credits style stuff where it seems really shallow and misleading to people more familiar with the subject. The inexplicable preoccupation with gamification by some pro-GG people has never really made sense. >>>/v/12130621 >Actually, yes, I do have to agree with you on not knowing why GG people are so motivated to take down Gamification. Actually looking up articles on it, numerous people are already coming out and saying… >It doesn't work! >So, then, what is it that we're fighting when it comes to gamification? Is it edutainment? If that is the case, why write an episode on it when supporting games that do it right (Or even making your own) would do just as well to fix it? >>>/v/12130694 >>>12130621 >It works in a few limited areas, but yeah it obviously didn't live up to all the hype from when it was a fad. >>>12130641 >That's not gamification, you can't gamify games. Gamification is introducing game elements to non-games, like cheevos and points. The closest thing to gamification of games is manipulative phone games and social media games that try to gamify external acts like "shill this shit to all your friends for an in-game reward". >The SJW Mario fangame that's a parody of (and similar games) are propaganda and the author and their supporters signaling about their politics. It's no different than shitty propaganda movies or books that are typically low-quality but get boosted up, like Crash winning an Oscar. It isn't about gameplay elements, and indeed many of them are barely games.