>>25438
Being patently offensive is no justification for double standards. Especially considering the Jews making Big Mouth could probably level the exact same arguments at loli. They could easily say lolicon materials are "the real pedo toons" and their stuff is "innocent comedy" since loli is made to be erotic cartoons of children, and thus "beyond offensive", while their shit is so ugly they can say it's not intended to arouse. It's real easy man. Just have consistent beliefs that don't waver the second something looks icky. Else you're no better than the average reactionary normalfag.
>not because they're calling for it's creators to be arrested over it
Only one guy implied this
>>25423, and I'm not sure he was really trying to just because he replied to someone who set up that position as a strawman or misunderstanding of the western vs eastern art analogy.